Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ROCK vs NCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
ROCK vs NCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $23M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $8M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116M | $9M |
ROCK vs NCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gibraltar Industrie… (ROCK) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
| Neo-Concept Interna… (NCI) | 100 | 17.5 | -82.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROCK vs NCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 40.0% 10Y total return vs NCI's -97.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 10.9%, current ratio 1.72x
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 21.7x)
NCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -1.05
- Rev growth 35.3%, EPS growth 81.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- Beta -1.05, current ratio 1.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.3% revenue growth vs ROCK's -13.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs ROCK's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (10.9% vs 122.5%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -30.6% vs ROCK's -33.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs ROCK's 0.6%, ROIC 10.6% vs 10.4% |
ROCK vs NCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ROCK vs NCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROCK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 5.1x NCI's $236M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.4% (NCI) to 0.7% (ROCK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $114M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
ROCK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, ROCK trades at a 47% valuation discount to NCI's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROCK's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCI's 13.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $23M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $30M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.57x | 21.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.37x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.23x | 13.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 3.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.22x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $1 for ROCK. ROCK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCI's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCI scores 6/9 vs ROCK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +29.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +19.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 1.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $60M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.29x | 3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ROCK five years ago would be worth $4,486 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $234 for NCI. Over the past 12 months, NCI leads with a -30.6% total return vs ROCK's -33.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROCK at -11.2% vs NCI's -71.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.0% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.8% | -30.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.9% | -97.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.1% | -97.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | -97.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.2% | -71.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROCK and NCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCI is the less volatile stock with a -1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROCK's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROCK currently trades 50.1% from its 52-week high vs NCI's 8.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | -1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.08 | $13.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.25 | $0.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.1% | +8.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 38.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 330K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
NCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | 0.0% |
ROCK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NCI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ROCK vs NCI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROCK or NCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the stronger pick with 35.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 2% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK). Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROCK or NCI?
On trailing P/E, Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
(ROCK) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited at 21. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROCK or NCI?
Over the past 5 years, Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
(ROCK) delivered a total return of -55. 1%, compared to -97. 7% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROCK returned +40. 0% versus NCI's -97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROCK or NCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
05β versus Gibraltar Industries, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning ROCK is approximately -251% more volatile than NCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 122% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROCK or NCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is pulling ahead at 35.
3% versus -13. 2% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited grew EPS 81. 8% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCI leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROCK or NCI?
Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
(ROCK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 3. 4% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROCK leads at 10. 8% versus 4. 9% for NCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROCK leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ROCK or NCI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ROCK or NCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
05)). Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCI: -97. 1%, ROCK: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ROCK and NCI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROCK (Industrials) and NCI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ROCK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NCI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.