Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.45B | $22.48B | $20.25B | $25.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $813M | $3.24B | $4.07B | $1.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $265M | $327M | $177M |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 43.2% | 45.2% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 29.1% | 14.8% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 37.7x | 41.4x | 30.4x | 76.9x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $3.89B | $4.69B | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $360M | $675M | $112M |
ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Corporation (ROG) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 3.97x
- Beta 1.24, current ratio 3.97x
- Beta 1.24 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
ENTG is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 76.9x)
- +306.1% vs ENTG's +88.9%
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.6%, EPS growth -170.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- 32.6% revenue growth vs ROG's -2.3%
- 16.5% margin vs ROG's -6.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs ROG's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 76.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs ROG's -6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs ENTG's +88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs ROG's -3.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.6% |
ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ROG leads 1 • ENTG leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 5.0x ROG's $813M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROG's -6.9%. On growth, MTSI holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $813M | $3.2B | $4.1B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $1.3B | $945M | $210M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $265M | $327M | $177M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $721M | $401M | $168M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +43.2% | +45.2% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +29.1% | +14.8% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +8.2% | +8.0% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +22.3% | +9.8% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | +5.0% | +15.2% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +46.3% | +53.2% | +42.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ROG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 28% valuation discount to ENTG's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 136.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $22.5B | $20.2B | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $26.0B | $24.3B | $26.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.85x | 95.26x | 68.83x | -471.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.71x | 41.38x | 30.36x | 76.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.82x | 19.81x | 26.70x | 136.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.02x | 7.03x | 5.15x | 26.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 5.68x | 7.49x | 19.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.43x | 56.74x | 40.74x | 134.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ROG and MTSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ROG. ROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ROG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | +6.7% | +12.2% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +3.1% | +3.7% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +9.3% | +6.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +11.7% | +7.2% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.98x | 1.73x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$157M | $3.5B | $4.0B | $426M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $360M | $675M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $3.9B | $4.7B | $538M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.38x | 2.47x | 2.84x | 391.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $61,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,218 for ROG. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs ROG's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.2% | +65.1% | +78.8% | +96.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.8% | +88.9% | +306.1% | +203.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.8% | +87.4% | +266.0% | +526.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | +30.4% | +66.5% | +513.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.5% | +1040.3% | +750.6% | +795.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | +23.3% | +54.1% | +84.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROG and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs MKSI's 92.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 2.66x | 2.64x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $144.46 | $159.15 | $326.83 | $355.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.17 | $66.32 | $71.49 | $110.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +92.8% | +92.0% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.8 | 63.8 | 65.3 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 2.4M | 1.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ENTG and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ROG as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.3% upside for ROG (target: $150) vs -26.3% for MTSI (target: $254). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $150.00 | $152.00 | $272.86 | $254.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 26 | 29 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 | $0.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ROG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ROG vs ENTG vs MKSI vs MTSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rogers Corporation (ROG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Entegris, Inc. at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +513. 6%, compared to -27. 8% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1040% versus ROG's +117. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rogers Corporation (ROG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
24β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 114% more volatile than ROG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rogers Corporation (ROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -2. 3% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -340. 0% for Rogers Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI?
MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -7. 6% for Rogers Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus 6. 4% for ROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 46. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROG: 9. 3% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ROG, MTSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROG or ENTG or MKSI or MTSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rogers Corporation (ROG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
24), +117. 5% 10Y return). MKS Inc. (MKSI) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROG: +117. 5%, MKSI: +750. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROG and ENTG and MKSI and MTSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ROG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.