Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Electrical Equipment & Parts
ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.45B | $25.84B | $22.48B | $5.14B | $868M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $813M | $1.07B | $3.24B | $768M | $224M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $177M | $265M | $3M | $-547M |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 55.3% | 43.2% | 48.0% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 16.0% | 29.1% | 6.9% | -79.2% |
| Forward P/E | 37.7x | 76.9x | 41.4x | 37.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $40M | $538M | $3.89B | $39M | $713M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $112M | $360M | $216M | $73M |
ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Corporation (ROG) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 439.0 | +339.0% |
| T1 Energy Inc (TE) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 3.97x
- Beta 1.24 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.6%, EPS growth -170.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 32.6% revenue growth vs TE's -393.5%
- 16.5% margin vs TE's -243.6%
- 8.6% ROA vs TE's -39.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs -8.9%
ENTG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs KLIC's 8.1%
KLIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.87, yield 1.0%
- Beta 1.87, yield 1.0%, current ratio 4.79x
- Better valuation composite
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
TE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +299.2% vs ENTG's +88.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs TE's -393.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs TE's -243.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +299.2% vs ENTG's +88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs TE's -39.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs -8.9% |
ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KLIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ROG leads 1 • MTSI leads 1 • ENTG leads 0 • TE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MTSI and ENTG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENTG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 14.4x TE's $224M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TE's -2.4%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $813M | $1.1B | $3.2B | $768M | $224M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $210M | $1.3B | $61M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $177M | $265M | $3M | -$547M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $168M | $721M | $11M | -$55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +55.3% | +43.2% | +48.0% | +35.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +16.0% | +29.1% | +6.9% | -79.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +16.5% | +8.2% | +0.4% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +15.6% | +22.3% | +1.4% | -24.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | +22.5% | +5.0% | +49.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +42.9% | +46.3% | +141.5% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ROG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 95.3x trailing earnings, ENTG trades at a 99% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KLIC's 336.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $25.8B | $22.5B | $5.1B | $868M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $26.3B | $26.0B | $5.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.85x | -471.88x | 95.26x | 9999.00x | -1.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.71x | 76.91x | 41.38x | 37.41x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.82x | 136.13x | 19.81x | 336.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.02x | 26.71x | 7.03x | 7.85x | 295.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 19.20x | 5.68x | 6.36x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.43x | 134.01x | 56.74x | 53.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for TE. ROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TE's 3.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLIC scores 7/9 vs TE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | +13.2% | +6.7% | +0.4% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +8.6% | +3.1% | +0.3% | -39.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +6.0% | +9.3% | -0.3% | -8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +7.6% | +11.7% | -0.3% | -9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.41x | 0.98x | 0.05x | 3.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$157M | $426M | $3.5B | -$177M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $112M | $360M | $216M | $73M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $538M | $3.9B | $39M | $713M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.38x | 391.47x | 2.47x | 4872.17x | -3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $61,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,160 for TE. Over the past 12 months, TE leads with a +299.2% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs TE's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.2% | +96.9% | +65.1% | +103.4% | -34.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.8% | +203.8% | +88.9% | +220.8% | +299.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.8% | +526.9% | +87.4% | +115.0% | -30.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | +513.6% | +30.4% | +101.0% | -48.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.5% | +795.9% | +1040.3% | +814.1% | -47.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | +84.4% | +23.3% | +29.1% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROG and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs TE's 52.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.75x | 2.66x | 1.87x | 2.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $144.46 | $355.00 | $159.15 | $107.01 | $9.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.17 | $110.09 | $66.32 | $29.91 | $0.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +97.0% | +92.8% | +91.7% | +52.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.8 | 71.3 | 63.8 | 77.0 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 1.1M | 2.4M | 617K | 14.9M |
Analyst Outlook
KLIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ROG as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", KLIC as "Buy", TE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.9% upside for TE (target: $11) vs -36.3% for KLIC (target: $63). For income investors, KLIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.04% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $150.00 | $254.00 | $152.00 | $62.50 | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 | 26 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.40 | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.9% | 0.0% |
KLIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). ROG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ROG vs MTSI vs ENTG vs KLIC vs TE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) offers the better valuation at 95. 3x trailing P/E (41. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rogers Corporation (ROG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE?
On trailing P/E, Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the cheapest at 95. 3x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +513. 6%, compared to -48. 4% for T1 Energy Inc (TE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1040% versus TE's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rogers Corporation (ROG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
24β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 114% more volatile than ROG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rogers Corporation (ROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for T1 Energy Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -527. 5% for T1 Energy Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE?
Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -153. 0% for T1 Energy Inc — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -25. 2% for TE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) trades at 37. 4x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 39. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TE: 103. 9% to $10. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE?
In this comparison, KLIC (1.
0% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ROG, MTSI, TE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROG or MTSI or ENTG or KLIC or TE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +814. 1% 10Y return). T1 Energy Inc (TE) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +814. 1%, TE: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROG and MTSI and ENTG and KLIC and TE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROG (Technology) and MTSI (Technology) and ENTG (Technology) and KLIC (Technology) and TE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ROG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KLIC pays a dividend while ROG, MTSI, ENTG, TE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.