Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ROKU vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
ROKU vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $18.90B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.97B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $201M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 58.1x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $872M | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.59B | $553M |
ROKU vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roku, Inc. (ROKU) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 213.6 | +113.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROKU vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROKU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth 166.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.9%
- 444.6% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -5.4%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs MGNI's 6.9%
MGNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.63
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 30.2%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 1.63, current ratio 1.02x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs MGNI's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 58.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs ROKU's 4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.63 vs ROKU's 2.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +112.3% vs MGNI's +8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs ROKU's 4.6%, ROIC 9.5% vs -0.3% |
ROKU vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROKU vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ROKU and MGNI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROKU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 6.9x MGNI's $723M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROKU's 4.1%. On growth, ROKU holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $223M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $201M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $653M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 94% valuation discount to ROKU's 216.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ROKU's 54.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.9B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.2B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 216.92x | 14.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.12x | 12.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 54.29x | 10.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.99x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.27x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.51x | 11.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for ROKU. MGNI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROKU's 0.33x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.6% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$715M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $872M | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 129.08x | 3.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROKU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ROKU five years ago would be worth $4,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,153 for MGNI. Over the past 12 months, ROKU leads with a +112.3% total return vs MGNI's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROKU at 31.9% vs MGNI's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | -16.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +112.3% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.7% | +51.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.0% | -58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +444.6% | -5.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.9% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROKU and MGNI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGNI is the less volatile stock with a 1.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROKU's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROKU currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs MGNI's 50.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $128.50 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.77 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +50.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.9 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ROKU as "Buy" and MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.4% upside for MGNI (target: $18) vs 11.1% for ROKU (target: $142).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $142.19 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +2.4% |
MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ROKU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ROKU vs MGNI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROKU or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roku, Inc.
(ROKU) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roku, Inc. (ROKU) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROKU or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Roku, Inc. at 216. 9x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROKU or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, Roku, Inc.
(ROKU) delivered a total return of -55. 0%, compared to -58. 5% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROKU returned +444. 6% versus MGNI's -5. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROKU or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 63β versus Roku, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ROKU is approximately 29% more volatile than MGNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 33% for Roku, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROKU or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roku, Inc.
(ROKU) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus 6. 9% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to 166. 3% for Roku, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROKU leads at 14. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROKU or MGNI?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Roku, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -0. 1% for ROKU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGNI leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROKU or MGNI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 58. 1x for Roku, Inc. — 45. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGNI: 34. 4% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROKU or MGNI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ROKU or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Roku, Inc. (ROKU) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGNI: -5. 4%, ROKU: +444. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROKU and MGNI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ROKU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 11%
- Gross Margin > 26%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.