ROL vs SCI

For growth investors, Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for Service Corporation International (SCI). Service Corporation International (SCI) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Service Corporation International (SCI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the cheapest at 20.

6x versus Rollins, Inc. at 49. 7x. On forward P/E, Service Corporation International is actually cheaper at 18. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Rollins, Inc. wins at 2. 95x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 29x.

Over the past 5 years, Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) delivered a total return of +54. 1%, compared to +51. 3% for Service Corporation International (SCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROL returned +380. 6% versus SCI's +226. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Service Corporation International (SCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

11β versus Rollins, Inc. 's 0. 24β — meaning ROL is approximately 110% more volatile than SCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rollins, Inc. (ROL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 3% for Service Corporation International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 2. 9% for Service Corporation International (SCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rollins, Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Service Corporation International. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROL leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 0% net margin versus 12. 6% for Service Corporation International — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCI leads at 22. 6% versus 19. 4% for ROL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROL leads at 49. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Rollins, Inc. (ROL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 95x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 29x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Service Corporation International (SCI) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 44. 5x for Rollins, Inc. — 25. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCI: 18. 6% to $93. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Service Corporation International (SCI) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 1. 2% for Rollins, Inc. (ROL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

11), 1. 6% yield, +226. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCI: +226. 8%, ROL: +380. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.