Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ROLR vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ROLR vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $57M | $2.57T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 27.1x |
| Total Debt | $807K | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $86.81B |
ROLR vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Roller Technol… (ROLR) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 133.6 | +33.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROLR vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROLR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.16 vs AMZN's 0.97
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 27.1x), PEG 0.16 vs 0.97
- +137.8% vs AMZN's +11.9%
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.43
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 27.1x), PEG 0.16 vs 0.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs ROLR's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs ROLR's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.8% vs AMZN's +11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs ROLR's 4.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -119.9% |
ROLR vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 43569.7x ROLR's $17M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROLR's 5.9%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ROLR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, ROLR trades at a 47% valuation discount to AMZN's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ROLR offers better value at 0.16x vs AMZN's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $2.57T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $2.63T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.64x | 33.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 6.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 333.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for ROLR. ROLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs ROLR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -119.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.7% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $807,000 | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.49x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs AMZN's +11.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +190.0% | +5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | +11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +88.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +41.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +567.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.68 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $197.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 42.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $307.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROLR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
ROLR vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROLR or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROLR or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, High Roller Technologies, Inc.
(ROLR) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 33. 3x.
03Which is safer — ROLR or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately 91% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ROLR or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ROLR or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 3. 4% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROLR leads at 53. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ROLR or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+567. 1% 10Y return). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ROLR and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.