Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $57M | $2.57T | $2.90T | $1.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $742.78B | $318.27B | $713M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $90.80B | $125.22B | $-159M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 50.6% | 68.3% | 22.6% |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | 11.5% | 46.8% | -18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 27.1x | 23.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $807K | $152.99B | $112.18B | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $86.81B | $30.24B | $281M |
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Roller Technol… (ROLR) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 133.6 | +33.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 89.9 | -10.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.16 vs MSFT's 1.24
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 23.3x), PEG 0.16 vs 1.24
- +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6%
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.8%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.84, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
GENI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.0%, EPS growth -63.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 23.3x), PEG 0.16 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs GENI's -22.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs ROLR's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs -16.6% |
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories
GENI leads 1 • ROLR leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 43569.7x ROLR's $17M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -22.3%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +30.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $742.8B | $318.3B | $713M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $155.9B | $192.6B | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $90.8B | $125.2B | -$159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2.5B | $72.9B | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +50.6% | +68.3% | +22.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | +11.5% | +46.8% | -18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +12.2% | +39.3% | -22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -0.3% | +22.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.3% | +16.6% | +18.3% | +30.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +74.8% | +23.4% | -6.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GENI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, ROLR trades at a 47% valuation discount to AMZN's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ROLR offers better value at 0.16x vs MSFT's 1.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $2.57T | $2.90T | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $2.63T | $2.98T | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.64x | 33.27x | 28.65x | -15.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.13x | 23.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | 1.19x | 1.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.06x | 18.35x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 3.58x | 10.30x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 6.28x | 8.49x | 2.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 333.39x | 40.53x | 27.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-22 for GENI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +23.3% | +33.1% | -22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +11.5% | +19.2% | -15.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -119.9% | +14.7% | +24.9% | -16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.7% | +15.3% | +29.7% | -15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.37x | 0.33x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $66.2B | $81.9B | -$250M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $86.8B | $30.2B | $281M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $807,000 | $153.0B | $112.2B | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.49x | 39.96x | 55.65x | -75.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ROLR and AMZN and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $15,605 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,776 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs GENI's -34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 23.5% vs GENI's 4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +190.0% | +5.3% | -17.0% | -36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | +11.9% | -17.7% | -34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +88.5% | +20.7% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +41.0% | +56.0% | -62.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +567.1% | +727.4% | -31.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +23.5% | +6.5% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.43x | 0.84x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.68 | $278.56 | $555.45 | $13.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $197.28 | $356.28 | $3.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +85.6% | +70.3% | +49.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 36.8 | 36.8 | 73.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 42.9M | 33.7M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMZN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", GENI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.3% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 29.0% for AMZN (target: $308). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $307.77 | $551.96 | $9.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 | 82 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 21 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GENI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI?
On trailing P/E, High Roller Technologies, Inc.
(ROLR) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 23. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +56.
0%, compared to -62. 2% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +727. 4% versus GENI's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately 226% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to -63. 0% for Genius Sports Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 23. 3x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 41. 3% to $551. 96.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ROLR, AMZN, GENI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 0. 8% yield, +727. 4% 10Y return). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROLR and AMZN and MSFT and GENI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROLR (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and MSFT (Technology) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSFT pays a dividend while ROLR, AMZN, GENI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.