Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ROP vs MSCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
ROP vs MSCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $36.05B | $42.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.12B | $3.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.71B | $1.32B |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 82.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.1% | 54.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 29.7x |
| Total Debt | $9.30B | $6.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $297M | $515M |
ROP vs MSCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roper Technologies,… (ROP) | 100 | 88.9 | -11.1% |
| MSCI Inc. (MSCI) | 100 | 177.0 | +77.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROP vs MSCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.43, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 0.52x
MSCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs ROP's 112.0%
- Beta 0.61, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.90x
- 38.4% margin vs ROP's 21.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% revenue growth vs MSCI's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 29.7x), PEG 1.67 vs 1.75 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs ROP's 21.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs MSCI's 0.61 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs ROP's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.1% vs ROP's -37.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.0% ROA vs ROP's 5.0%, ROIC 34.9% vs 6.1% |
ROP vs MSCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ROP vs MSCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSCI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 2.6x MSCI's $3.1B. MSCI is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROP's 21.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.1B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.2B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +82.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +54.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +38.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.1% | +49.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.7x trailing earnings, ROP trades at a 34% valuation discount to MSCI's 37.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSCI offers better value at 2.21x vs ROP's 2.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36.1B | $42.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45.1B | $48.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.67x | 37.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.98x | 29.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.57x | 2.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.50x | 24.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.56x | 13.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.90x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.46x | 27.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSCI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSCI scores 8/9 vs ROP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +24.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +34.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.0B | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $297M | $515M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.3B | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.50x | 7.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSCI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSCI five years ago would be worth $12,833 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,174 for ROP. Over the past 12 months, MSCI leads with a +8.1% total return vs ROP's -37.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSCI at 8.4% vs ROP's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.0% | +3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.9% | +8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.5% | +27.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.3% | +28.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.0% | +723.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | +8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROP and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSCI's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSCI currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $584.03 | $626.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $313.86 | $501.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.0% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 519K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ROP and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ROP as "Buy" and MSCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for ROP (target: $458) vs 15.8% for MSCI (target: $674). For income investors, MSCI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs ROP's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $457.64 | $674.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | $7.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +5.9% |
MSCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ROP vs MSCI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROP or MSCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for MSCI Inc. (MSCI). Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) offers the better valuation at 24. 7x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROP or MSCI?
On trailing P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the cheapest at 24. 7x versus MSCI Inc. at 37. 4x. On forward P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Roper Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 67x versus MSCI Inc. 's 1. 75x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROP or MSCI?
Over the past 5 years, MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) delivered a total return of +28. 3%, compared to -18. 3% for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSCI returned +723. 8% versus ROP's +112. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROP or MSCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus MSCI Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning MSCI is approximately 42% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ROP or MSCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 9. 7% for MSCI Inc. (MSCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MSCI Inc. grew EPS 10. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 0% for Roper Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROP or MSCI?
MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 4% net margin versus 19. 4% for Roper Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSCI leads at 54. 7% versus 28. 3% for ROP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSCI leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROP or MSCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 67x versus MSCI Inc. 's 1. 75x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 7x for MSCI Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROP: 30. 7% to $457. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROP or MSCI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MSCI Inc. (MSCI) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP).
09Is ROP or MSCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 1. 2% yield, +723. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSCI: +723. 8%, ROP: +112. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROP and MSCI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROP (Industrials) and MSCI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.