Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $117M | $885M | $6.72B | $6.81B | $23.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31M | $597M | $3.46B | $2.09B | $3.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-178M | $-12M | $425M | $449M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 44.6% | 45.3% | 61.8% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | -148.8% | -2.6% | 4.9% | 24.9% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.0x | 20.8x | 13.5x | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $111M | $2.04B | $1.65B | $1.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $280M | $299M | $839M | $588M |
RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid Micro Biosyst… (RPID) | 100 | 11.9 | -88.1% |
| Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
| Bruker Corporation (BRKR) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| Qiagen N.V. (QGEN) | 100 | 59.0 | -41.0% |
| Waters Corporation (WAT) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RPID is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 2.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs BRKR's 2.1%
AZTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BRKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +9.5% vs AZTA's -30.6%
QGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 3.90x
- PEG 0.30 vs WAT's 4.74
- Beta 0.40, yield 0.8%, current ratio 3.90x
WAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 165.6% 10Y total return vs AZTA's 130.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs BRKR's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 24.5x), PEG 0.30 vs 4.74 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs RPID's -145.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs RPID's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BRKR's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.5% vs AZTA's -30.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs RPID's -51.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs -69.9% |
RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QGEN leads in 4 of 6 categories
WAT leads 1 • RPID leads 0 • AZTA leads 0 • BRKR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QGEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 123.5x RPID's $31M. QGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPID's -145.1%. On growth, WAT holds the edge at +91.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31M | $597M | $3.5B | $2.1B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | $41M | $397M | $714M | $953M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$178M | -$12M | $425M | $449M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $29M | $51M | $453M | $264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +44.6% | +45.3% | +61.8% | +55.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -148.8% | -2.6% | +4.9% | +24.9% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -145.1% | -29.9% | -0.3% | +20.3% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -126.4% | +4.8% | +1.5% | +21.7% | +7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +1.0% | +2.7% | +3.7% | +91.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -3.0% | -79.2% | +26.8% | -142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
QGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, QGEN trades at a 51% valuation discount to WAT's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QGEN offers better value at 0.36x vs WAT's 6.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $117M | $885M | $6.7B | $6.8B | $23.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $717M | $8.5B | $7.6B | $24.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.50x | -15.75x | -294.40x | 16.20x | 33.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.96x | 20.84x | 13.47x | 24.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.36x | 6.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.35x | 18.55x | 10.68x | 21.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 1.49x | 1.96x | 3.26x | 7.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.54x | 0.51x | 2.67x | 1.82x | 8.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.10x | 155.25x | 15.02x | 42.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QGEN delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-74 for RPID. AZTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRKR's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QGEN scores 8/9 vs RPID's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.9% | -10.7% | -0.5% | +11.9% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.6% | -8.8% | -0.2% | +7.0% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.9% | -0.5% | +4.4% | +8.6% | +20.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -69.2% | -0.6% | +5.0% | +9.5% | +18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.06x | 0.81x | 0.44x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$169M | $1.7B | $815M | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $280M | $299M | $839M | $588M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $111M | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -107.47x | — | 1.14x | 15.74x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAT five years ago would be worth $11,181 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,229 for RPID. Over the past 12 months, BRKR leads with a +9.5% total return vs AZTA's -30.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RPID at 46.9% vs AZTA's -24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | -42.4% | -8.1% | -21.8% | -7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.3% | -30.6% | +9.5% | -15.6% | +1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.9% | -57.7% | -42.0% | -21.7% | +19.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | -78.2% | -34.1% | -23.1% | +11.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +130.4% | +68.7% | +63.0% | +165.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.9% | -24.9% | -16.6% | -7.8% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QGEN and WAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QGEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RPID's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAT currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs AZTA's 46.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.91x | 1.66x | 0.40x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.94 | $41.73 | $56.22 | $57.82 | $414.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.01 | $17.11 | $28.53 | $32.92 | $275.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.2% | +46.1% | +78.5% | +57.1% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 32.0 | 67.8 | 26.5 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 1.0M | 1.9M | 1.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
QGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RPID as "Buy", AZTA as "Buy", BRKR as "Buy", QGEN as "Hold", WAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 204.2% upside for RPID (target: $8) vs 13.4% for WAT (target: $403). For income investors, QGEN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.79% vs BRKR's 0.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $44.67 | $51.22 | $47.50 | $402.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 32 | 30 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.15 | $0.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.5% | +0.1% |
QGEN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
RPID vs AZTA vs BRKR vs QGEN vs WAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
(RPID) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Bruker Corporation (BRKR). Qiagen N. V. (QGEN) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT?
On trailing P/E, Qiagen N.
V. (QGEN) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Waters Corporation at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, Qiagen N. V. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qiagen N. V. wins at 0. 30x versus Waters Corporation's 4. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT?
Over the past 5 years, Waters Corporation (WAT) delivered a total return of +11.
8%, compared to -87. 7% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAT returned +165. 6% versus RPID's -87. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qiagen N.
V. (QGEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning RPID is approximately 373% more volatile than QGEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 81% for Bruker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
(RPID) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 2. 1% for Bruker Corporation (BRKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qiagen N. V. grew EPS 436. 8% year-over-year, compared to -119. 7% for Bruker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RPID leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT?
Qiagen N.
V. (QGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -140. 3% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAT leads at 28. 2% versus -141. 1% for RPID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QGEN leads at 61. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qiagen N. V. (QGEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Waters Corporation's 4. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qiagen N. V. (QGEN) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Azenta, Inc. — 23. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPID: 204. 2% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT?
In this comparison, QGEN (0.
8% yield), BRKR (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RPID, AZTA, WAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RPID or AZTA or BRKR or QGEN or WAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qiagen N.
V. (QGEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 0. 8% yield). Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QGEN: +63. 0%, RPID: -87. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RPID and AZTA and BRKR and QGEN and WAT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RPID is a small-cap high-growth stock; AZTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QGEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. QGEN pays a dividend while RPID, AZTA, BRKR, WAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.