Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RPID
Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$114M
5Y Perf.-88.5%
IDXX
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$45.45B
5Y Perf.-15.7%
NEOG
Neogen Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-78.8%
BRKR
Bruker Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.66B
5Y Perf.-46.8%
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$855M
5Y Perf.-79.1%

RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RPID logoRPID
IDXX logoIDXX
NEOG logoNEOG
BRKR logoBRKR
AZTA logoAZTA
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$114M$45.45B$2.01B$6.66B$855M
Revenue (TTM)$31M$4.45B$880M$3.46B$597M
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$1.10B$-603M$-12M$-178M
Gross Margin18.4%62.1%38.0%45.3%44.6%
Operating Margin-148.8%31.6%-2.0%4.9%-26.4%
Forward P/E39.5x25.9x20.7x23.7x
Total Debt$24M$1.08B$913M$2.04B$111M
Cash & Equiv.$20M$180M$129M$299M$280M

RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RPID
IDXX
NEOG
BRKR
AZTA
StockJul 21May 26Return
Rapid Micro Biosyst… (RPID)10011.5-88.5%
IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX)10084.3-15.7%
Neogen Corporation (NEOG)10021.2-78.8%
Bruker Corporation (BRKR)10053.2-46.8%
Azenta, Inc. (AZTA)10020.9-79.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IDXX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Bruker Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. RPID and NEOG also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RPID
Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
The Growth Play

RPID ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 2.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
  • 19.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2%
Best for: growth exposure
IDXX
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IDXX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs BRKR's 67.1%
  • 24.6% margin vs RPID's -145.1%
  • Beta 1.35 vs AZTA's 2.17
  • 32.6% ROA vs RPID's -51.6%, ROIC 42.5% vs -69.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
NEOG
Neogen Corporation
The Defensive Pick

NEOG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.83, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 3.32x
  • Beta 1.83, current ratio 3.32x
  • +56.0% vs AZTA's -26.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BRKR
Bruker Corporation
The Income Pick

BRKR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 0.3%
  • Lower P/E (20.7x vs 25.9x)
  • 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AZTA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRPID logoRPID19.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2%
ValueBRKR logoBRKRLower P/E (20.7x vs 25.9x)
Quality / MarginsIDXX logoIDXX24.6% margin vs RPID's -145.1%
Stability / SafetyIDXX logoIDXXBeta 1.35 vs AZTA's 2.17
DividendsBRKR logoBRKR0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NEOG logoNEOG+56.0% vs AZTA's -26.5%
Efficiency (ROA)IDXX logoIDXX32.6% ROA vs RPID's -51.6%, ROIC 42.5% vs -69.9%

RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RPIDRapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
71.9%$26M
Service
28.1%$10M
IDXXIDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
59.0%$2.5B
Service
41.0%$1.8B
NEOGNeogen Corporation
FY 2025
Product
89.1%$797M
Service
10.9%$97M
BRKRBruker Corporation
FY 2025
Product
80.5%$2.8B
Product and Service, Other
19.5%$670M
AZTAAzenta, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
70.8%$421M
Product
29.2%$173M

RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIDXXLAGGINGBRKR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

IDXX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 145.7x RPID's $31M. IDXX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPID's -145.1%. On growth, IDXX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRPID logoRPIDRapid Micro Biosy…IDXX logoIDXXIDEXX Laboratorie…NEOG logoNEOGNeogen CorporationBRKR logoBRKRBruker CorporationAZTA logoAZTAAzenta, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$31M$4.4B$880M$3.5B$597M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$42M$1.5B$100M$397M-$115M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M$1.1B-$603M-$12M-$178M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$39M$845M$17M$51M$29M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.4%+62.1%+38.0%+45.3%+44.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-148.8%+31.6%-2.0%+4.9%-26.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-145.1%+24.6%-68.5%-0.3%-29.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-126.4%+19.0%+2.0%+1.5%+4.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.1%+14.3%-2.8%+2.7%+1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+16.6%+96.5%-79.2%-3.0%
IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AZTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AZTA's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IDXX's 31.6x.

MetricRPID logoRPIDRapid Micro Biosy…IDXX logoIDXXIDEXX Laboratorie…NEOG logoNEOGNeogen CorporationBRKR logoBRKRBruker CorporationAZTA logoAZTAAzenta, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$114M$45.4B$2.0B$6.7B$855M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$118M$46.3B$2.8B$8.4B$687M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.44x43.75x-1.84x-291.53x-15.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.39.45x25.87x20.68x23.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple31.60x20.70x18.41x13.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.39x10.56x2.25x1.94x1.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.44x28.75x0.97x2.64x0.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.14x153.73x22.32x
AZTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IDXX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-74 for RPID. AZTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRKR's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDXX scores 7/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRPID logoRPIDRapid Micro Biosy…IDXX logoIDXXIDEXX Laboratorie…NEOG logoNEOGNeogen CorporationBRKR logoBRKRBruker CorporationAZTA logoAZTAAzenta, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-73.9%+70.9%-28.6%-0.5%-10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-51.6%+32.6%-17.9%-0.2%-8.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-69.9%+42.5%+0.2%+4.4%-0.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-69.2%+61.4%+0.2%+5.0%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937346
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.72x0.67x0.44x0.81x0.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M$897M$784M$1.7B-$169M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$180M$129M$299M$280M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$1.1B$913M$2.0B$111M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-107.47x35.55x-8.33x1.14x
IDXX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — RPID and IDXX and NEOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IDXX five years ago would be worth $10,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,196 for RPID. Over the past 12 months, NEOG leads with a +56.0% total return vs AZTA's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RPID at 45.6% vs AZTA's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRPID logoRPIDRapid Micro Biosy…IDXX logoIDXXIDEXX Laboratorie…NEOG logoNEOGNeogen CorporationBRKR logoBRKRBruker CorporationAZTA logoAZTAAzenta, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-18.5%-14.6%+32.1%-9.0%-44.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.3%+17.6%+56.0%+7.8%-26.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+208.4%+17.9%-46.1%-42.5%-59.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.0%+5.1%-80.6%-35.5%-81.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.0%+556.2%-49.8%+67.1%+123.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+45.6%+5.6%-18.6%-16.9%-25.8%
Evenly matched — RPID and IDXX and NEOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IDXX and NEOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IDXX is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AZTA's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEOG currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs AZTA's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRPID logoRPIDRapid Micro Biosy…IDXX logoIDXXIDEXX Laboratorie…NEOG logoNEOGNeogen CorporationBRKR logoBRKRBruker CorporationAZTA logoAZTAAzenta, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.96x1.35x1.83x1.59x2.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.94$769.98$11.43$56.22$41.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.01$471.74$4.53$28.53$17.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.8%+74.3%+80.9%+77.8%+44.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.752.146.264.831.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded205K533K2.5M1.9M1.0M
Evenly matched — IDXX and NEOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: RPID as "Buy", IDXX as "Buy", NEOG as "Hold", BRKR as "Buy", AZTA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 212.5% upside for RPID (target: $8) vs 18.9% for NEOG (target: $11). BRKR is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricRPID logoRPIDRapid Micro Biosy…IDXX logoIDXXIDEXX Laboratorie…NEOG logoNEOGNeogen CorporationBRKR logoBRKRBruker CorporationAZTA logoAZTAAzenta, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$773.13$11.00$52.13$44.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts422113212
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.15
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+2.7%0.0%+0.2%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

IDXX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AZTA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallIDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.

(RPID) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) offers the better valuation at 43. 7x trailing P/E (39. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?

On forward P/E, Bruker Corporation is actually cheaper at 20.

7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?

Over the past 5 years, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.

(IDXX) delivered a total return of +5. 1%, compared to -88. 0% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +556. 2% versus RPID's -88. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.

(IDXX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Azenta, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning AZTA is approximately 61% more volatile than IDXX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 81% for Bruker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.

(RPID) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Azenta, Inc. grew EPS 60. 5% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RPID leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?

IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.

(IDXX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -140. 3% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDXX leads at 31. 6% versus -141. 1% for RPID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDXX leads at 61. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Bruker Corporation (BRKR) trades at 20.

7x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 18. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPID: 212. 5% to $8. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?

In this comparison, BRKR (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. RPID, IDXX, NEOG, AZTA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.

(IDXX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+556. 2% 10Y return). Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDXX: +556. 2%, RPID: -88. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RPID and IDXX and NEOG and BRKR and AZTA?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RPID is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AZTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RPID

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IDXX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEOG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BRKR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AZTA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RPID and IDXX and NEOG and BRKR and AZTA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RPID: 3.1% · IDXX: 14.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.