Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $114M | $45.45B | $2.01B | $6.66B | $855M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31M | $4.45B | $880M | $3.46B | $597M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $1.10B | $-603M | $-12M | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 62.1% | 38.0% | 45.3% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | -148.8% | 31.6% | -2.0% | 4.9% | -26.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 39.5x | 25.9x | 20.7x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $1.08B | $913M | $2.04B | $111M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $180M | $129M | $299M | $280M |
RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid Micro Biosyst… (RPID) | 100 | 11.5 | -88.5% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 84.3 | -15.7% |
| Neogen Corporation (NEOG) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Bruker Corporation (BRKR) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
| Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) | 100 | 20.9 | -79.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RPID ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 2.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2%
IDXX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs BRKR's 67.1%
- 24.6% margin vs RPID's -145.1%
- Beta 1.35 vs AZTA's 2.17
- 32.6% ROA vs RPID's -51.6%, ROIC 42.5% vs -69.9%
NEOG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.83, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 3.32x
- Beta 1.83, current ratio 3.32x
- +56.0% vs AZTA's -26.5%
BRKR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 0.3%
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 25.9x)
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, AZTA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs RPID's -145.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs AZTA's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.0% vs AZTA's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs RPID's -51.6%, ROIC 42.5% vs -69.9% |
RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDXX leads in 2 of 6 categories
AZTA leads 1 • RPID leads 0 • NEOG leads 0 • BRKR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDXX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 145.7x RPID's $31M. IDXX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPID's -145.1%. On growth, IDXX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31M | $4.4B | $880M | $3.5B | $597M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | $1.5B | $100M | $397M | -$115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $1.1B | -$603M | -$12M | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $845M | $17M | $51M | $29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +62.1% | +38.0% | +45.3% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -148.8% | +31.6% | -2.0% | +4.9% | -26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -145.1% | +24.6% | -68.5% | -0.3% | -29.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -126.4% | +19.0% | +2.0% | +1.5% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +14.3% | -2.8% | +2.7% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +16.6% | +96.5% | -79.2% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AZTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AZTA's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IDXX's 31.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $45.4B | $2.0B | $6.7B | $855M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $118M | $46.3B | $2.8B | $8.4B | $687M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.44x | 43.75x | -1.84x | -291.53x | -15.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.45x | 25.87x | 20.68x | 23.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.06x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 31.60x | 20.70x | 18.41x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 10.56x | 2.25x | 1.94x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.44x | 28.75x | 0.97x | 2.64x | 0.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.14x | — | 153.73x | 22.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-74 for RPID. AZTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRKR's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDXX scores 7/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.9% | +70.9% | -28.6% | -0.5% | -10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.6% | +32.6% | -17.9% | -0.2% | -8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.9% | +42.5% | +0.2% | +4.4% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -69.2% | +61.4% | +0.2% | +5.0% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.67x | 0.44x | 0.81x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $897M | $784M | $1.7B | -$169M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $180M | $129M | $299M | $280M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $1.1B | $913M | $2.0B | $111M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -107.47x | 35.55x | -8.33x | 1.14x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RPID and IDXX and NEOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDXX five years ago would be worth $10,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,196 for RPID. Over the past 12 months, NEOG leads with a +56.0% total return vs AZTA's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RPID at 45.6% vs AZTA's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.5% | -14.6% | +32.1% | -9.0% | -44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | +17.6% | +56.0% | +7.8% | -26.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.4% | +17.9% | -46.1% | -42.5% | -59.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.0% | +5.1% | -80.6% | -35.5% | -81.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.0% | +556.2% | -49.8% | +67.1% | +123.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.6% | +5.6% | -18.6% | -16.9% | -25.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IDXX and NEOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDXX is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AZTA's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEOG currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs AZTA's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 1.35x | 1.83x | 1.59x | 2.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.94 | $769.98 | $11.43 | $56.22 | $41.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.01 | $471.74 | $4.53 | $28.53 | $17.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.8% | +74.3% | +80.9% | +77.8% | +44.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 52.1 | 46.2 | 64.8 | 31.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 533K | 2.5M | 1.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RPID as "Buy", IDXX as "Buy", NEOG as "Hold", BRKR as "Buy", AZTA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 212.5% upside for RPID (target: $8) vs 18.9% for NEOG (target: $11). BRKR is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $773.13 | $11.00 | $52.13 | $44.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 22 | 11 | 32 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.7% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
IDXX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AZTA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RPID vs IDXX vs NEOG vs BRKR vs AZTA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
(RPID) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) offers the better valuation at 43. 7x trailing P/E (39. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?
On forward P/E, Bruker Corporation is actually cheaper at 20.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?
Over the past 5 years, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) delivered a total return of +5. 1%, compared to -88. 0% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +556. 2% versus RPID's -88. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Azenta, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning AZTA is approximately 61% more volatile than IDXX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 81% for Bruker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
(RPID) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Azenta, Inc. grew EPS 60. 5% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RPID leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -140. 3% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDXX leads at 31. 6% versus -141. 1% for RPID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDXX leads at 61. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bruker Corporation (BRKR) trades at 20.
7x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 18. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPID: 212. 5% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA?
In this comparison, BRKR (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. RPID, IDXX, NEOG, AZTA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RPID or IDXX or NEOG or BRKR or AZTA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+556. 2% 10Y return). Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDXX: +556. 2%, RPID: -88. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RPID and IDXX and NEOG and BRKR and AZTA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RPID is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AZTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.