Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RPID vs TMO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
RPID vs TMO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $117M | $172.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31M | $45.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $6.86B |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 39.4% |
| Operating Margin | -148.8% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $40.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $9.86B |
RPID vs TMO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid Micro Biosyst… (RPID) | 100 | 11.9 | -88.1% |
| Thermo Fisher Scien… (TMO) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RPID vs TMO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RPID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 2.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 71.9%, current ratio 3.31x
- 19.7% revenue growth vs TMO's 3.9%
TMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.4%
- 222.6% 10Y total return vs RPID's -87.7%
- Beta 1.07, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.89x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs TMO's 3.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs RPID's -145.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs RPID's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs RPID's +7.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs RPID's -51.6%, ROIC 7.5% vs -69.9% |
RPID vs TMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RPID vs TMO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 1480.8x RPID's $31M. TMO is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPID's -145.1%. On growth, TMO holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31M | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $6.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +39.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -148.8% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -145.1% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -126.4% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +11.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RPID leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $117M | $172.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $203.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.50x | 26.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 12.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 3.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.54x | 3.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMO delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-74 for RPID. RPID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMO's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMO scores 6/9 vs RPID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.9% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -69.2% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $31.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $9.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $40.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -107.47x | 5.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RPID and TMO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMO five years ago would be worth $10,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,229 for RPID. Over the past 12 months, TMO leads with a +13.6% total return vs RPID's +7.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RPID at 46.9% vs TMO's -4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | -21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.3% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.9% | -13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +222.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.9% | -4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMO is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RPID's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMO currently trades 72.2% from its 52-week high vs RPID's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.94 | $643.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.01 | $385.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.2% | +72.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RPID as "Buy" and TMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 204.2% upside for RPID (target: $8) vs 40.8% for TMO (target: $655). TMO is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $654.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.7% |
TMO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RPID leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RPID vs TMO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RPID or TMO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
(RPID) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 9% for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) offers the better valuation at 26. 2x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RPID or TMO?
Over the past 5 years, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) delivered a total return of +1. 9%, compared to -87. 7% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMO returned +222. 6% versus RPID's -87. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RPID or TMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning RPID is approximately 78% more volatile than TMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 72% versus 76% for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RPID or TMO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
(RPID) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 3. 9% for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to 2. 8% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RPID leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RPID or TMO?
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 1% net margin versus -140. 3% for Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMO leads at 18. 2% versus -141. 1% for RPID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMO leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RPID or TMO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPID: 204.
2% to $8. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — RPID or TMO?
In this comparison, TMO (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. RPID does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RPID or TMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +222. 6% 10Y return). Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc. (RPID) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMO: +222. 6%, RPID: -87. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RPID and TMO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RPID is a small-cap high-growth stock; TMO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.