Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $3.18B | $9.75B | $35.69B | $6.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $17.72B | $13.74B | $4.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $183M | $1.84B | $1.84B |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 44.2% | 26.7% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 5.2% | 24.6% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 22.1x | 16.2x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $56.16B | $16.14B | $3.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $2.06B | $3.84B | $353M |
RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Rock Resorts, I… (RRR) | 100 | 389.4 | +289.4% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| Las Vegas Sands Cor… (LVS) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RRR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 0.79x
MGM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LVS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth 19.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 46.9%
- Beta 1.09, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- 15.2% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BYD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- 365.7% 10Y total return vs RRR's 251.9%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 16.2x)
- 45.0% margin vs MGM's 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 16.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs MGM's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BYD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.7% vs MGM's +20.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs MGM's 0.4%, ROIC 12.3% vs 1.7% |
RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RRR leads in 3 of 6 categories
BYD leads 2 • MGM leads 0 • LVS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 8.8x RRR's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGM's 1.0%. On growth, LVS holds the edge at +25.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $17.7B | $13.7B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $795M | $2.0B | $4.9B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $183M | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $610M | $1.7B | $2.3B | $388M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | +44.2% | +26.7% | +42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +5.2% | +24.6% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +1.0% | +13.4% | +45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +9.8% | +16.9% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +4.2% | +25.3% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -5.9% | +73.5% | -6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BYD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 92% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRR's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $9.8B | $35.7B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $63.8B | $48.0B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.22x | 50.14x | 22.89x | 3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.44x | 22.10x | 16.20x | 11.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.89x | 31.61x | 10.37x | 7.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 0.56x | 2.74x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.59x | 3.08x | 19.27x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.00x | 5.85x | 21.58x | 16.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LVS delivers a 95.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $5 for MGM. RRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRR scores 7/9 vs BYD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.6% | +5.3% | +95.8% | +91.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +0.4% | +8.5% | +27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +1.7% | +16.9% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +2.6% | +19.0% | +15.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 17.14x | 8.34x | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$84M | $54.1B | $12.3B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $2.1B | $3.8B | $353M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $56.2B | $16.1B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.99x | 1.52x | 4.25x | 15.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RRR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RRR five years ago would be worth $16,833 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,551 for MGM. Over the past 12 months, LVS leads with a +38.7% total return vs MGM's +20.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RRR at 8.1% vs MGM's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | +4.4% | -16.6% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +20.1% | +38.7% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | -12.3% | -9.0% | +24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.3% | -4.5% | -1.9% | +30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.9% | +81.8% | +52.5% | +365.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | -4.3% | -3.1% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs LVS's 76.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.28x | 1.09x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.99 | $40.94 | $70.45 | $89.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.16 | $29.19 | $38.91 | $69.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +93.1% | +76.3% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 50.0 | 45.7 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 964K | 4.4M | 3.9M | 932K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LVS and BYD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RRR as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", LVS as "Buy", BYD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for RRR (target: $71) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40). For income investors, LVS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.24% vs BYD's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.44 | $39.71 | $69.70 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 36 | 49 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — | +2.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | — | $1.20 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +12.6% | +6.2% | +12.1% |
RRR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BYD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
RRR vs MGM vs LVS vs BYD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD?
Over the past 5 years, Red Rock Resorts, Inc.
(RRR) delivered a total return of +68. 3%, compared to -4. 5% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +365. 7% versus LVS's +52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 48% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 3% for MGM Resorts International. Over a 3-year CAGR, LVS leads at 46. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus 1. 2% for MGM Resorts International — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 5. 7% for MGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for MGM Resorts International — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRR: 32. 9% to $71. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD?
In this comparison, LVS (2.
2% yield), RRR (2. 2% yield), BYD (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MGM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RRR or MGM or LVS or BYD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +365. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +365. 7%, MGM: +81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RRR and MGM and LVS and BYD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LVS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock. RRR, LVS, BYD pay a dividend while MGM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.