RRX vs ITT

For growth investors, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX). ITT Inc. (ITT) offers the better valuation at 33. 7x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the cheapest at 33. 7x versus Regal Rexnord Corporation at 50. 8x. On forward P/E, Regal Rexnord Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.

(ITT) delivered a total return of +112. 6%, compared to +54. 5% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITT returned +527. 0% versus RRX's +269. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Regal Rexnord Corporation's 2. 05β — meaning RRX is approximately 66% more volatile than ITT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ITT Inc. (ITT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 74% for Regal Rexnord Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.

(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -1. 6% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regal Rexnord Corporation grew EPS 43. 5% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for ITT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITT leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus 4. 7% for Regal Rexnord Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITT leads at 17. 4% versus 11. 5% for RRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRX leads at 37. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) trades at 20.

1x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for ITT Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITT: 17. 2% to $241. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ITT Inc. (ITT) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), 0. 7% yield, +527. 0% 10Y return). Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITT: +527. 0%, RRX: +269. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.