RRX vs ITT vs AME vs ROK

For growth investors, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX). ITT Inc. (ITT) offers the better valuation at 33. 7x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the cheapest at 33. 7x versus Rockwell Automation, Inc. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, Regal Rexnord Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ITT Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus AMETEK, Inc. 's 2. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.

(ITT) delivered a total return of +112. 6%, compared to +54. 5% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITT returned +527. 0% versus RRX's +269. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Regal Rexnord Corporation's 2. 05β — meaning RRX is approximately 117% more volatile than AME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMETEK, Inc. (AME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 98% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.

(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -1. 6% for Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regal Rexnord Corporation grew EPS 43. 5% year-over-year, compared to -7. 4% for Rockwell Automation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITT leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus 4. 7% for Regal Rexnord Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AME leads at 26. 2% versus 11. 5% for RRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROK leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ITT Inc. (ITT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus AMETEK, Inc. 's 2. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 35. 4x for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITT: 17. 2% to $241. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 5% for AMETEK, Inc. (AME).

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 0. 5% yield, +418. 8% 10Y return). Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AME: +418. 8%, RRX: +269. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.