Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $668M | $98M | $67.98B | $13.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $170M | $2.32B | $37.21B | $16.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-140M | $-2.15B | $1.89B |
| Gross Margin | 64.4% | 51.0% | 41.5% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.7% | -3.0% | -4.0% | 19.0% |
| Forward P/E | 101.8x | 5.0x | 93.5x | 12.2x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $0.00 | $32.57B | $7.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | — | $4.57B | $5.35B |
RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reservoir Media, In… (RSVR) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 17.3 | -82.7% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
| Fox Corporation (FOX) | 100 | 189.0 | +89.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RSVR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 12.2x)
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs FOX's +20.6%
FOX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 104.9% 10Y total return vs RSVR's 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 12.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.4% margin vs AMCX's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs WBD's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs FOX's +20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 16.5% vs 12.1% |
RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOX leads in 2 of 6 categories
RSVR leads 1 • AMCX leads 1 • WBD leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSVR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.2B annually — 219.4x RSVR's $170M. FOX is the more profitable business, keeping 11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%. On growth, RSVR holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $170M | $2.3B | $37.2B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $686M | $7.5B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$140M | -$2.2B | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.8B | $267M | $2.3B | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.4% | +51.0% | +41.5% | +33.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -3.0% | -4.0% | +19.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -6.0% | -5.8% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +75.5% | +11.5% | +6.2% | +15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.8% | -6.3% | -1.0% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.3% | -10.4% | -5.5% | -35.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, FOX trades at a 88% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RSVR's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $668M | $98M | $68.0B | $13.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $98M | $96.0B | $15.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 84.83x | — | 93.52x | 11.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 101.80x | 5.04x | — | 12.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.95x | 0.08x | 13.73x | 4.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.21x | 0.04x | 1.82x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | — | 1.85x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.32x | 22.02x | 4.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOX delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. FOX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RSVR's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOX scores 8/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -12.2% | -5.9% | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | -3.3% | -2.2% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +12.1% | +1.5% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | — | +1.5% | +16.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | — | 0.88x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $372M | $0 | $28.0B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | — | $4.6B | $5.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $0 | $32.6B | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.37x | 0.95x | 3.56x | 8.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOX five years ago would be worth $15,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,813 for AMCX. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs FOX's +20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.3% vs AMCX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.1% | -7.5% | -4.9% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.3% | +29.1% | +216.8% | +20.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | -44.0% | +101.5% | +96.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.7% | -81.9% | -27.8% | +59.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | -87.4% | -3.7% | +104.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | -17.6% | +26.3% | +25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RSVR and FOX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSVR currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs FOX's 82.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.86x | 0.90x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.32 | $10.18 | $30.00 | $68.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.97 | $5.41 | $8.06 | $46.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +84.1% | +90.4% | +82.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 57.3 | 48.9 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 386K | 22.2M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
FOX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RSVR as "Buy", AMCX as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", FOX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.8% upside for FOX (target: $79) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8). FOX is the only dividend payer here at 1.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $8.00 | $29.94 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 40 | 32 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.5% |
FOX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). RSVR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
RSVR vs AMCX vs WBD vs FOX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.
5x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOX) delivered a total return of +59.
0%, compared to -81. 9% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOX returned +104. 9% versus AMCX's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 75% more volatile than FOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fox Corporation (FOX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 108% for Reservoir Media, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RSVR leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX?
Fox Corporation (FOX) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSVR leads at 22. 1% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSVR leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 101. 8x for Reservoir Media, Inc. — 96. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 39. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX?
In this comparison, FOX (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. RSVR, AMCX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RSVR or AMCX or WBD or FOX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 1% yield, +104. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOX: +104. 9%, AMCX: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RSVR and AMCX and WBD and FOX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RSVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FOX pays a dividend while RSVR, AMCX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 38%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.