Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3.24B | $4.67B | $2.35B | $866M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.17B | $1.40B | $1.28B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $568M | $135M | $-364M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | 44.2% | 18.2% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 6.8% | -18.6% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | 17.6x | 610.9x | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $14.89B | $1.24B | $423M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $474M | $540M | $10M |
RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 23.4 | -76.6% |
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RUN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.89
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
- 17.9% margin vs SEDG's -28.6%
ENPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 17.4% 10Y total return vs RUN's 86.7%
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
- 4.2% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -5.3%
SEDG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, Low D/E 99.1%, current ratio 2.17x
- +161.4% vs SPWR's -42.4%
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 17.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 17.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs SEDG's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +161.4% vs SPWR's -42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -5.3% |
RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENPH leads 1 • SEDG leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 10.1x SPWR's $315M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEDG's -28.6%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $541M | $171M | -$225M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $568M | $135M | -$364M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$326M | $145M | $78M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +44.2% | +18.2% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +6.8% | -18.6% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +9.6% | -28.6% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +10.4% | +6.1% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | -20.6% | +41.5% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -127.3% | +100.0% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RUN and SPWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 71% valuation discount to ENPH's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENPH's 22.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $4.7B | $2.3B | $866M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.9B | $5.4B | $2.2B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.07x | 27.50x | -5.60x | -15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.75x | 17.61x | 610.92x | 5.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.36x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.31x | 22.19x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 3.17x | 1.98x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 4.40x | 5.40x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.75x | 29.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. SEDG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs SPWR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +13.3% | -79.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +4.2% | -15.9% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +6.8% | -29.5% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +6.8% | -19.2% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.99x | 1.14x | 0.99x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.6B | $769M | -$116M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $474M | $540M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.9B | $1.2B | $423M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.02x | 47.60x | -2.80x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RUN five years ago would be worth $3,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,752 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +161.4% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RUN at -7.1% vs SEDG's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | +5.1% | +23.1% | -38.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.7% | -18.9% | +161.4% | -42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.7% | -78.3% | -86.8% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | -71.2% | -82.5% | -81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.7% | +1737.8% | +70.9% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.1% | -39.9% | -49.0% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENPH and SEDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEDG currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 1.70x | 2.03x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.44 | $54.43 | $53.75 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.38 | $25.78 | $13.73 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.5% | +65.2% | +71.8% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 52.1 | 45.7 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.4M | 5.9M | 3.6M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RUN as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold", SEDG as "Hold", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -9.1% for SEDG (target: $35).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.14 | $43.48 | $35.09 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 55 | 48 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ENPH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RUN vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) delivered a total return of -69. 8%, compared to -82. 5% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 70% more volatile than ENPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -34. 2% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -24. 1% for SEDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 610. 9x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 605. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RUN or ENPH or SEDG or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1738% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1738%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RUN and ENPH and SEDG and SPWR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.