RUN vs NEE vs ARRY vs ENPH

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 36x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) delivered a total return of +42. 0%, compared to -72. 5% for Sunrun Inc. (RUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1765% versus ARRY's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 1295% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEE leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 82x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 23. 6x for NextEra Energy, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 41. 4% to $18. 14.

In this comparison, NEE (2.

3% yield) pays a dividend. RUN, ARRY, ENPH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 3% yield, +274. 2% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +274. 2%, ARRY: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (RUN (Energy) and NEE (Utilities) and ARRY (Energy) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NEE pays a dividend while RUN, ARRY, ENPH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.