Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RVMD vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RVMD vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $32.12B | $6.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.37B | $-381M |
| Total Debt | $159M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $384M | $146M |
RVMD vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 527.5 | +427.5% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 571.3 | +471.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RVMD vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RVMD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.08
- EPS growth -66.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 7.14x
NUVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 456.1% 10Y total return vs RVMD's 422.7%
- 38.2% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
- 3.4% margin vs RVMD's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.2% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs RVMD's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs NUVL's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +303.5% vs NUVL's +52.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -38.9% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC -32.6% vs -54.3% |
RVMD vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RVMD vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RVMD and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.4B | -$408M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.4B | -$381M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | -$264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -102.7% | -32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.1B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.9B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.39x | -26.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.61x | 6.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NUVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NUVL delivers a -45.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-45 in annual profit, vs $-83 for RVMD.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.2% | -45.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.1% | -38.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.3% | -32.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.0% | -31.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$225M | -$146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $384M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $159M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.62x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RVMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $55,605 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52,093 for RVMD. Over the past 12 months, RVMD leads with a +303.5% total return vs NUVL's +52.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RVMD at 83.5% vs NUVL's 40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.2% | +3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +303.5% | +52.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.1% | +176.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +420.9% | +456.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +422.7% | +456.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +83.5% | +40.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RVMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVL's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVMD currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs NUVL's 92.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.70 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.00 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 539K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RVMD as "Buy" and NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs 2.5% for RVMD (target: $155).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $154.80 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NUVL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RVMD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
RVMD vs NUVL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RVMD or NUVL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RVMD or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +456. 1%, compared to +420. 9% for Revolution Medicines, Inc. (RVMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +456. 1% versus RVMD's +422. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RVMD or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Nuvalent, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning NUVL is approximately 1% more volatile than RVMD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RVMD or NUVL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Revolution Medicines, Inc.
grew EPS -66. 2% year-over-year, compared to -81. 1% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RVMD or NUVL?
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Nuvalent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RVMD leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for NUVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RVMD leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RVMD or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RVMD or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +456. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +456. 1%, RVMD: +422. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RVMD and NUVL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.