Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $1M | $451M | $36M | $506M | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $953M | $85M | $223M | $3.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $56M | $-3M | $16M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 42.7% | 21.4% | 23.1% | 60.4% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -32.6% | 14.8% | -2.6% | 0.8% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.2x | 5.8x | — | 20.3x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $1.05B | $3M | $8M | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $77M | $7M | $67M | $964M |
RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryvyl Inc. (RVYL) | 100 | 160.7 | +60.7% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| Usio, Inc. (USIO) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RVYL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (3.2x vs 8.4x)
- +6.5% vs FOUR's -43.7%
PRTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
- 2.6% ROA vs RVYL's -85.3%, ROIC 13.4% vs -64.4%
USIO is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.60 vs RVYL's 2.20
IIIV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 1.95x
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 1.95x
- 7.3% margin vs RVYL's -56.4%
FOUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.5%, EPS growth -64.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- 39.7% 10Y total return vs RVYL's 275.0%
- 25.5% revenue growth vs RVYL's -15.0%
- 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% revenue growth vs RVYL's -15.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.2x vs 8.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs RVYL's -56.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs RVYL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.5% vs FOUR's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs RVYL's -85.3%, ROIC 13.4% vs -64.4% |
RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories
RVYL leads 1 • USIO leads 0 • IIIV leads 0 • FOUR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 94.1x RVYL's $35M. IIIV is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RVYL's -56.4%. On growth, PRTH holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $953M | $85M | $223M | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $204M | -$298,381 | $31M | $629M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $56M | -$3M | $16M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $75M | $1.08T | $10M | $687M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.7% | +21.4% | +23.1% | +60.4% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | +14.8% | -2.6% | +0.8% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.4% | +5.8% | -2.9% | +7.3% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +7.9% | +12632.5% | +4.7% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.9% | +8.8% | +8.2% | -14.6% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.8% | +3.1% | -3.3% | -78.0% | -105.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RVYL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 81% valuation discount to FOUR's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IIIV's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $451M | $36M | $506M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $1.4B | $31M | $447M | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | 8.10x | -14.04x | 40.91x | 43.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.21x | 5.78x | — | 20.30x | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.95x | — | 14.02x | 9.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.47x | 0.43x | 2.37x | 0.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.97x | 1.51x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.06x | 6.01x | 33.67x | 134.87x | 7.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PRTH and IIIV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOUR delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-2 for RVYL. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs USIO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | — | -13.5% | +3.2% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -85.3% | +2.6% | -2.2% | +2.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.4% | +13.4% | -12.0% | +0.6% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -67.5% | +16.0% | -10.4% | +0.7% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.14x | 0.01x | 2.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $969M | -$5M | -$59M | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $77M | $7M | $67M | $964M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $1.0B | $3M | $8M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.67x | 1.51x | -43.10x | 5.21x | 3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RVYL and PRTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $689 for RVYL. Over the past 12 months, RVYL leads with a +654.9% total return vs FOUR's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs USIO's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +3.6% | -5.1% | -9.3% | -25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +654.9% | -10.4% | -9.7% | -13.8% | -43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.7% | +50.5% | -33.8% | -2.5% | -24.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | -15.9% | -78.3% | -27.6% | -46.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.0% | -43.8% | -32.8% | +24.9% | +39.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +14.6% | -12.9% | -0.8% | -8.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RVYL and USIO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RVYL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVYL currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.20x | 2.12x | 0.60x | 0.92x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.55 | $8.89 | $2.02 | $33.97 | $108.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $4.44 | $1.03 | $19.89 | $39.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +62.0% | +64.9% | +67.4% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 53.4 | 69.0 | 47.8 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 252K | 37K | 292K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RVYL as "Hold", PRTH as "Buy", IIIV as "Buy", FOUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs 26.6% for IIIV (target: $29). FOUR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.00 | — | $29.00 | $73.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 5 | — | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.7% | +2.3% | +2.9% | +7.4% | +12.8% |
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). RVYL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
RVYL vs PRTH vs USIO vs IIIV vs FOUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the stronger pick with 25. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Ryvyl Inc. (RVYL). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Shift4 Payments, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Ryvyl Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR?
Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -93. 1% for Ryvyl Inc. (RVYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RVYL returned +275. 0% versus PRTH's -43. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Usio, Inc.
(USIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Ryvyl Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning RVYL is approximately 267% more volatile than USIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is pulling ahead at 25. 5% versus -15. 0% for Ryvyl Inc. (RVYL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -177. 8% for Usio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RVYL leads at 28. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR?
i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -47. 9% for Ryvyl Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -37. 3% for RVYL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIIV leads at 55. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ryvyl Inc.
(RVYL) trades at 3. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for i3 Verticals, Inc. — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR?
In this comparison, FOUR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RVYL, PRTH, USIO, IIIV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RVYL or PRTH or USIO or IIIV or FOUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Usio, Inc.
(USIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (USIO: -32. 8%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RVYL and PRTH and USIO and IIIV and FOUR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RVYL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; USIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock. FOUR pays a dividend while RVYL, PRTH, USIO, IIIV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.