REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RWT vs RC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
RWT vs RC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $697M | $357M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-229M |
| Gross Margin | 24.0% | -0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.1% | -50.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $22.16B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $256M | $248M |
RWT vs RC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RWT vs RC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RWT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 13.6%
- 11.5% 10Y total return vs RC's 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 0.28x
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- Beta 1.17, yield 31.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs RWT's 356.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs RWT's 356.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 13.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.9% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.3% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 3.9% vs 1.2% |
RWT vs RC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RWT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RWT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 2.1x RC's $499M. RWT is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10.1B | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | -0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | -50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -45.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +60.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +24.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RWT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RWT's 21.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $697M | $357M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.6B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.86x | -1.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.19x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.22x | 48.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RWT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RWT delivers a -6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. RC carries lower financial leverage with a 3.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RWT's 22.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RC scores 5/9 vs RWT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.6% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 22.56x | 3.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.9B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256M | $248M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.2B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.96x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RWT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RWT five years ago would be worth $8,326 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, RWT leads with a +7.9% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RWT at 9.6% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | -44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.6% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.7% | -44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.6% | -23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
RWT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RWT is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RWT currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.97 | $4.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.00 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RWT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RWT as "Hold" and RC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for RWT (target: $7) vs 15.7% for RC (target: $3). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs RWT's 13.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.6% | +31.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.4% | +18.9% |
RWT leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
RWT vs RC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RWT or RC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 356.
5% for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RWT or RC?
Over the past 5 years, Redwood Trust, Inc.
(RWT) delivered a total return of -16. 7%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RWT returned +11. 5% versus RC's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RWT or RC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Redwood Trust, Inc.
(RWT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 43% more volatile than RWT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 23% for Redwood Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RWT or RC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus 356.
5% for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ready Capital Corporation grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -296. 9% for Redwood Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RWT or RC?
Redwood Trust, Inc.
(RWT) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 3% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps -6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RWT leads at 95. 3% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RWT leads at 95. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RWT or RC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RWT: 16.
5% to $6. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — RWT or RC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 13. 6% for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT).
08Is RWT or RC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Redwood Trust, Inc.
(RWT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 13. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RWT: +11. 5%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RWT and RC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.