Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RWT vs RC vs BXMT vs SACH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$697M
5Y Perf.+4.3%
RC
Ready Capital Corporation

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$357M
5Y Perf.-63.2%
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.23B
5Y Perf.-18.8%
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateAMEX • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-61.9%

RWT vs RC vs BXMT vs SACH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RWT logoRWT
RC logoRC
BXMT logoBXMT
SACH logoSACH
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$697M$357M$3.23B$53M
Revenue (TTM)$1.06B$499M$1.54B$38M
Net Income (TTM)$-70M$-229M$104M$6M
Gross Margin24.0%-0.0%62.6%98.1%
Operating Margin24.1%-50.5%58.3%42.0%
Forward P/E7.2x12.0x28.1x
Total Debt$22.16B$5.86B$16.16B$278M
Cash & Equiv.$256M$248M$453M$11M

RWT vs RC vs BXMT vs SACHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RWT
RC
BXMT
SACH
StockMay 20May 26Return
Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT)100104.3+4.3%
Ready Capital Corpo… (RC)10036.8-63.2%
Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT)10081.2-18.8%
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH)10038.1-61.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RWT vs RC vs BXMT vs SACH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SACH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Redwood Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. RC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

RWT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (7.2x vs 28.1x)
  • 13.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4%
Best for: value and dividends
RC
Ready Capital Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

RC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 31.4%
  • Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
  • 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 50.5% 10Y total return vs RWT's 11.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

SACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.44, current ratio 0.84x
  • Beta 0.44, yield 18.4%, current ratio 0.84x
  • 16.7% margin vs RC's -45.8%
  • Beta 0.44 vs RC's 1.17, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRC logoRC17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
ValueRWT logoRWTLower P/E (7.2x vs 28.1x)
Quality / MarginsSACH logoSACH16.7% margin vs RC's -45.8%
Stability / SafetySACH logoSACHBeta 0.44 vs RC's 1.17, lower leverage
DividendsRWT logoRWT13.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4%
Momentum (1Y)SACH logoSACH+34.0% vs RC's -44.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SACH logoSACH1.3% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.2%

RWT vs RC vs BXMT vs SACH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRWTLAGGINGRC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RC and SACH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 40.6x SACH's $38M. SACH is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$499M$1.5B$38M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$266M-$249M$948M$17M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$70M-$229M$104M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10.1B$303M$335M$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.0%-0.0%+62.6%+98.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+24.1%-50.5%+58.3%+42.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.6%-45.8%+6.7%+16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.5%+60.6%+21.8%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.8%+8.7%+4.0%+145.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%+24.9%-79.9%
Evenly matched — RC and SACH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RWT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 28.1x trailing earnings, SACH trades at a 6% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SACH's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.

MetricRWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
Market CapShares × price$697M$357M$3.2B$53M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.6B$6.0B$18.9B$320M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.86x-1.50x29.92x28.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.19x11.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.22x48.25x16.35x11.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.63x0.71x2.12x1.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.74x0.22x0.93x0.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.71x21.11x
RWT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SACH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

SACH delivers a 3.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. SACH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RWT's 22.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXMT scores 6/9 vs RWT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.6%-12.2%+2.9%+3.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.3%-2.6%+0.5%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.9%+1.2%+4.3%+4.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.1%+1.4%+11.3%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage22.56x3.55x4.61x1.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$21.9B$5.6B$15.7B$267M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$256M$248M$453M$11M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22.2B$5.9B$16.2B$278M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.96x0.41x1.11x1.25x
SACH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BXMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BXMT five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +34.0% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.9%+1.4%+0.7%+10.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+7.9%-44.9%+12.1%+34.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+31.6%-54.4%+48.1%-42.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.7%-44.4%-4.1%-43.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.5%+6.1%+50.5%-5.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.6%-23.1%+14.0%-16.8%
BXMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BXMT and SACH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SACH is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.82x1.17x0.74x0.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.97$4.75$20.67$1.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.00$1.51$17.67$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.1%+45.5%+92.6%+81.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.264.147.558.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M2.1M1.4M157K
Evenly matched — BXMT and SACH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — RWT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: RWT as "Hold", RC as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for RWT (target: $7) vs 15.7% for RC (target: $3). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs BXMT's 9.86%.

MetricRWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.50$2.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts231618
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.6%+31.4%+9.9%+18.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.76$0.68$1.89$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.4%+18.9%+3.4%0.0%
Evenly matched — RWT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RWT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SACH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallRedwood Trust, Inc. (RWT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RWT vs RC vs BXMT vs SACH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18.

2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) offers the better valuation at 28. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH?

On trailing P/E, Sachem Capital Corp.

(SACH) is the cheapest at 28. 1x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Redwood Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH?

Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

(BXMT) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +50. 5% versus SACH's -5. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.

(SACH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 166% more volatile than SACH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 159% versus 23% for Redwood Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -18.

2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -296. 9% for Redwood Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SACH leads at 15. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH?

Sachem Capital Corp.

(SACH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RWT leads at 95. 3% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Redwood Trust, Inc.

(RWT) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RWT: 16. 5% to $6. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 9. 9% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).

09

Is RWT or RC or BXMT or SACH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.

(SACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SACH: -5. 2%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RWT and RC and BXMT and SACH?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RWT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RWT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 291%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 436%
  • Dividend Yield > 12.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BXMT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SACH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RWT and RC and BXMT and SACH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RWT: 582.5% · RC: 873.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.