REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $150.37B | $41.50B | $696M | $1.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $977M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $1.06B | $650M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $1.43B | $260M | $-70M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 95.5% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 24.0% | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | 77.5% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 24.1% | 41.0% |
| Forward P/E | 37.3x | 79.6x | 119.0x | 8.2x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $22.29B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $22.16B | $10.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $256M | $5.03B | $741M | $256M | $213M |
RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwood Trust, Inc.… (RWTN) | 100 | 99.8 | -0.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 232.9 | +132.9% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RWTN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 3.5%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 225.2% 10Y total return vs VTR's 66.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.15, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
Among these 5 stocks, VTR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RWT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 356.5% FFO/revenue growth vs RWTN's 13.3%
MFA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 8.2x)
- 20.7% margin vs RWTN's -7.2%
- 18.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 356.5% FFO/revenue growth vs RWTN's 13.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 8.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs RWTN's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs RWT's 0.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs RWT's +8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs RWTN's -0.3%, ROIC 0.5% vs -0.1% |
RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFA leads in 2 of 6 categories
RWTN leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • RWT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RWTN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 17.9x MFA's $650M. MFA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RWTN's -7.2%. On growth, RWT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $977M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $1.1B | $650M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $765M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $266M | $268M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | $1.4B | $260M | -$70M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.8B | $2.5B | $1.4B | -$10.1B | $91M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.5% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +24.0% | +59.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +77.5% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +24.1% | +41.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -6.6% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +21.9% | +22.4% | -9.5% | +14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +184.3% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +5.8% | +118.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +2.8% | -103.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MFA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, MFA trades at a 96% valuation discount to VTR's 161.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFA's 17.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $150.4B | $41.5B | $696M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.2B | $166.7B | $54.0B | $22.6B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.89x | 154.41x | 161.64x | -8.84x | 5.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.32x | 79.65x | 119.03x | 8.20x | 7.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 66.86x | 24.47x | 21.22x | 17.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.53x | 14.10x | 7.11x | 0.63x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.92x | 3.38x | 3.21x | 0.74x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 52.80x | 31.52x | — | 13.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFA delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7 for RWTN. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RWTN's 22.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs RWTN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.6% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -6.6% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -0.3% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +3.9% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +6.1% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 22.68x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 22.56x | 6.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22.0B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $21.9B | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256M | $5.0B | $741M | $256M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.3B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $22.2B | $11.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.48x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 0.96x | 1.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,536 for RWT. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +46.7% total return vs RWT's +8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.9% vs RWTN's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | +15.2% | +13.5% | +1.8% | +7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.7% | +46.7% | +36.1% | +8.3% | +19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | +191.6% | +95.8% | +31.4% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | +206.1% | +75.6% | -14.6% | +1.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | +225.2% | +66.1% | +11.4% | +8.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | +42.9% | +25.1% | +9.5% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RWT's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs RWT's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.15x | -0.01x | 0.82x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.77 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $6.97 | $10.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.97 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $5.00 | $8.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +97.7% | +98.6% | +79.9% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 54.5 | 55.8 | 42.8 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 2.6M | 3.5M | 1.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WELL and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", RWT as "Hold", MFA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.7% upside for RWT (target: $7) vs 3.5% for MFA (target: $10). For income investors, MFA offers the higher dividend yield at 18.08% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $233.25 | $93.91 | $6.50 | $10.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 32 | 23 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +13.6% | +18.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $0.76 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.4% | +1.5% |
MFA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RWTN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
RWTN vs WELL vs VTR vs RWT vs MFA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Redwood Trust, Inc.
(RWT) is the stronger pick with 356. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 3% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni (RWTN). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA?
On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Ventas, Inc. at 161. 6x. On forward P/E, MFA Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +206. 1%, compared to -14. 6% for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +225. 2% versus MFA's +8. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Redwood Trust, Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning RWT is approximately -7245% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 23% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Redwood Trust, Inc.
(RWT) is pulling ahead at 356. 5% versus 13. 3% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni (RWTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -296. 9% for Redwood Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA?
MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -25. 5% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RWT leads at 95. 3% versus -9. 7% for RWTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFA leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 119. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 111. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RWT: 16. 7% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the highest yield at 18. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is RWTN or WELL or VTR or RWT or MFA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +66. 1%, RWT: +11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RWTN and WELL and VTR and RWT and MFA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RWTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RWT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.