Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $239M | $2.46B | $1.41B | $4.10B | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $127M | $256M | $552M | $788M | $636M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-47M | $62M | $-5M | $-28M | $172M |
| Gross Margin | 77.0% | 72.4% | 75.5% | 71.0% | 59.1% |
| Operating Margin | -43.4% | 28.5% | -0.4% | -3.3% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.2x | 370.7x | — | 29.9x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $186M | $88M | $731M | $470M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $28M | $167M | $236M | $488M |
RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RxSight, Inc. (RXST) | 100 | 36.3 | -63.8% |
| LeMaitre Vascular, … (LMAT) | 100 | 198.1 | +98.1% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
| iRhythm Technologie… (IRTC) | 100 | 244.3 | +144.3% |
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 255.6 | +155.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RXST plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LMAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 0.7%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs TMDX's 226.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 47.2%, current ratio 12.89x
- Beta 0.57, yield 0.7%, current ratio 12.89x
ATRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, IRTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs RXST's -3.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 27.0% margin vs RXST's -36.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs RXST's -3.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs RXST's -36.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs RXST's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.3% vs RXST's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs RXST's -15.1%, ROIC 18.8% vs -13.3% |
RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
TMDX leads 2 • RXST leads 0 • ATRC leads 0 • IRTC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $788M annually — 6.2x RXST's $127M. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RXST's -36.6%. On growth, IRTC holds the edge at +25.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $127M | $256M | $552M | $788M | $636M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$57M | $81M | $13M | -$6M | $115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$47M | $62M | -$5M | -$28M | $172M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $79M | $54M | $19M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.0% | +72.4% | +75.5% | +71.0% | +59.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | +28.5% | -0.4% | -3.3% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.6% | +24.3% | -0.8% | -3.5% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +30.9% | +9.7% | +2.4% | +23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.5% | +11.2% | +14.3% | +25.7% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.0% | +41.7% | +101.6% | +55.7% | -71.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TMDX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, TMDX trades at a 65% valuation discount to LMAT's 42.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TMDX's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $4.1B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $230M | $2.6B | $1.3B | $4.6B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.11x | 42.82x | -115.83x | -89.83x | 14.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.17x | 370.67x | — | 29.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.21x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.39x | 77.75x | — | 18.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 9.85x | 2.63x | 5.49x | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 6.29x | 2.70x | 26.16x | 6.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.01x | 29.15x | 118.84x | 18.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-21 for IRTC. RXST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRTC's 4.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LMAT scores 7/9 vs RXST's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.0% | +16.2% | -1.0% | -20.6% | +41.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | +10.3% | -0.7% | -2.8% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.3% | +9.7% | -0.6% | -5.2% | +18.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | +12.3% | -0.6% | -4.4% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.47x | 0.18x | 4.79x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $157M | -$79M | $495M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $28M | $167M | $236M | $488M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $186M | $88M | $731M | $470M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4852.10x | 24.99x | 0.47x | -1.48x | 33.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LMAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $30,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,579 for ATRC. Over the past 12 months, LMAT leads with a +33.3% total return vs RXST's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMAT at 18.2% vs RXST's -33.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.1% | +34.9% | -29.2% | -28.7% | -40.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.1% | +33.3% | -8.3% | -8.3% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | +65.2% | -41.8% | -2.1% | +2.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | +118.2% | -64.2% | +56.1% | +200.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | +608.6% | +95.1% | +379.3% | +226.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.1% | +18.2% | -16.5% | -0.7% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
LMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LMAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXST's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LMAT currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs RXST's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.57x | 1.03x | 0.93x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.74 | $118.12 | $43.18 | $212.00 | $156.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.30 | $78.35 | $26.62 | $112.31 | $70.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.6% | +91.4% | +64.4% | +58.9% | +46.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 48.3 | 45.0 | 44.1 | 21.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 741K | 244K | 669K | 524K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RXST as "Hold", LMAT as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", IRTC as "Buy", TMDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for TMDX (target: $145) vs -5.9% for LMAT (target: $102). LMAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.75 | $101.50 | $50.67 | $193.67 | $144.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.79 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
LMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TMDX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
RXST vs LMAT vs ATRC vs IRTC vs TMDX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for RxSight, Inc. (RXST). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX?
On trailing P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. at 42. 8x. On forward P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -64. 2% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMAT returned +608. 6% versus RXST's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus RxSight, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning RXST is approximately 201% more volatile than LMAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RxSight, Inc. (RXST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus -3. 9% for RxSight, Inc. (RXST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for RxSight, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -29. 0% for RxSight, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMAT leads at 27. 2% versus -35. 8% for RXST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RXST leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 340. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMDX: 98. 6% to $144. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX?
In this comparison, LMAT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RXST, ATRC, IRTC, TMDX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RXST or LMAT or ATRC or IRTC or TMDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 0. 7% yield, +608. 6% 10Y return). RxSight, Inc. (RXST) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMAT: +608. 6%, RXST: -63. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RXST and LMAT and ATRC and IRTC and TMDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRTC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. LMAT pays a dividend while RXST, ATRC, IRTC, TMDX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.