Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Telecommunications Services
RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Telecommunications Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $869M | $8.71B | $1.79B | $2.04B | $1.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.70B | $12.12B | $9.83B | $12.64B | $41.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-146M | $-1.74B | $-1.28B | $18M | $-1.50B |
| Gross Margin | 18.5% | 35.2% | 33.3% | 13.7% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | -2.6% | 6.2% | 2.8% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 2.2x | 3.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $3.28B | $17.71B | $4.64B | $4.55B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $1.00B | $327M | $1.80B | $5.00B |
RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rackspace Technolog… (RXT) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| Concentrix Corporat… (CNXC) | 100 | 31.8 | -68.2% |
| DXC Technology Comp… (DXC) | 100 | 54.8 | -45.2% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 230.1 | +130.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RXT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, LUMN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CNXC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 5.6%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, current ratio 1.40x
- Beta 1.38, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.40x
DXC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 0.1% margin vs LUMN's -14.3%
- 0.1% ROA vs CNXC's -10.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs 5.6%
SIFY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 141.0% 10Y total return vs LUMN's -35.7%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs DXC's -5.8%
- Beta 1.33 vs LUMN's 2.74
- +264.2% vs CNXC's -46.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs DXC's -5.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +264.2% vs CNXC's -46.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs CNXC's -10.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs 5.6% |
RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DXC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SIFY leads 2 • CNXC leads 1 • RXT leads 0 • LUMN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LUMN and CNXC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 15.4x RXT's $2.7B. DXC is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, CNXC holds the edge at +4.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $12.1B | $9.8B | $12.6B | $41.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $162M | $2.4B | $773M | $1.5B | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$146M | -$1.7B | -$1.3B | $18M | -$1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $77M | $5.4B | $572M | $939M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +35.2% | +33.3% | +13.7% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -2.6% | +6.2% | +2.8% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -14.3% | -13.0% | +0.1% | -3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +44.9% | +5.8% | +7.4% | -9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | -8.9% | +4.3% | -1.2% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.7% | 0.0% | -14.9% | -158.7% | -3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
DXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DXC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SIFY's 18.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $869M | $8.7B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $25.4B | $6.1B | $4.8B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.71x | -4.83x | -1.25x | 5.71x | -119.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 2.17x | 3.78x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.20x | 9.91x | 4.84x | 2.38x | 18.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.70x | 0.18x | 0.16x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.58x | 0.64x | 4.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.59x | 23.49x | 3.13x | 2.48x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DXC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DXC delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. DXC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXC scores 8/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -79.4% | -33.2% | +0.5% | -7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | -5.3% | -10.8% | +0.1% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | -0.8% | +5.6% | +8.1% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -0.6% | +6.6% | +7.6% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.69x | 1.30x | 1.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | $16.7B | $4.3B | $2.8B | $34.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $1.0B | $327M | $1.8B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $17.7B | $4.6B | $4.5B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.03x | -1.12x | -3.07x | 2.45x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIFY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIFY five years ago would be worth $8,793 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,484 for RXT. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +264.2% total return vs CNXC's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs CNXC's -30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +261.4% | +10.0% | -36.5% | -14.8% | +29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +146.2% | +100.0% | -46.7% | -22.4% | +264.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.2% | +267.8% | -65.7% | -46.7% | +113.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.2% | -28.8% | -80.3% | -65.2% | -12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | -35.7% | -61.0% | -48.8% | +141.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.3% | +54.4% | -30.0% | -18.9% | +28.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SIFY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIFY is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIFY currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs CNXC's 41.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 2.74x | 1.38x | 1.44x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.62 | $11.95 | $62.14 | $17.26 | $17.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $3.37 | $22.85 | $11.07 | $4.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +70.8% | +41.0% | +69.5% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 73.4 | 36.1 | 42.6 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17.0M | 12.5M | 1.6M | 2.9M | 56K |
Analyst Outlook
CNXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RXT as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold", CNXC as "Buy", DXC as "Hold", SIFY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.2% upside for CNXC (target: $52) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). CNXC is the only dividend payer here at 5.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.33 | $7.08 | $52.00 | $13.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 28 | 9 | 24 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +5.6% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $1.42 | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.5% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
DXC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SIFY leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
RXT vs LUMN vs CNXC vs DXC vs SIFY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the stronger pick with 11.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). DXC Technology Company (DXC) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY?
On forward P/E, Concentrix Corporation is actually cheaper at 2.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY?
Over the past 5 years, Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) delivered a total return of -12.
1%, compared to -85. 2% for Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIFY returned +141. 0% versus RXT's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 107% more volatile than SIFY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DXC Technology Company (DXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 130% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is pulling ahead at 11.
9% versus -5. 8% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DXC Technology Company grew EPS 356. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNXC leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY?
DXC Technology Company (DXC) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
0% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNXC leads at 6. 2% versus -3. 7% for RXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) trades at 2.
2x forward P/E versus 3. 8x for DXC Technology Company — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNXC: 104. 2% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY?
In this comparison, CNXC (5.
6% yield) pays a dividend. RXT, LUMN, DXC, SIFY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RXT or LUMN or CNXC or DXC or SIFY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5.
6% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXC: -61. 0%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RXT and LUMN and CNXC and DXC and SIFY?
These companies operate in different sectors (RXT (Technology) and LUMN (Communication Services) and CNXC (Technology) and DXC (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DXC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNXC pays a dividend while RXT, LUMN, DXC, SIFY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.