Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $31.49B | $54.25B | $37.50B | $22.33B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.59B | $63.36B | $60.47B | $28.88B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.17B | $5.01B | $3.67B | $817M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 24.5% | 64.2% | 16.5% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 9.2% | 8.4% | 3.4% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 15.2x | 12.5x | 17.0x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $21.08B | $31.04B | $5.98B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $4.31B | $5.94B | $3.23B | $10.27B | $343.34B |
RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) | 100 | 227.3 | +127.3% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 296.1 | +196.1% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 333.8 | +233.8% |
| Southwest Airlines … (LUV) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYAAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.8%, current ratio 0.90x
- 12.2% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
DAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +71.5% vs RYAAY's +8.8%
Among these 6 stocks, UAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LUV doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs LUV's 2.8%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs UAL's 162.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs LUV's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs UAL's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.5% vs RYAAY's +8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5% |
RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UAL leads in 1 of 6 categories
RYAAY leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • KO leads 1 • DAL leads 0 • LUV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LUV and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 18.0x RYAAY's $15.6B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUV's 2.8%. On growth, LUV holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.6B | $63.4B | $60.5B | $28.9B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.7B | $8.9B | $8.1B | $2.5B | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.2B | $5.0B | $3.7B | $817M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $3.8B | $3.2B | -$401M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +24.5% | +64.2% | +16.5% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +9.2% | +8.4% | +3.4% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +7.9% | +6.1% | +2.8% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +6.1% | +5.3% | -1.4% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +2.9% | +10.6% | +12.8% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.0% | +44.2% | +84.5% | +2.7% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UAL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, DAL trades at a 81% valuation discount to LUV's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31.5B | $54.2B | $37.5B | $22.3B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.0B | $71.0B | $62.6B | $25.1B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.72x | 10.84x | 11.30x | 57.56x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.78x | 15.17x | 12.48x | 17.03x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.73x | 8.59x | 8.18x | 12.62x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 0.86x | 0.63x | 0.80x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | 2.62x | 2.47x | 3.18x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.01x | 14.12x | 14.67x | — | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAAY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $11 for LUV. RYAAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYAAY scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.6% | +24.1% | +24.9% | +10.7% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +6.2% | +4.7% | +2.8% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.3% | +12.0% | +9.1% | +3.0% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.1% | +11.4% | +9.3% | +2.2% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 1.02x | 2.03x | 0.75x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $16.8B | $25.1B | $2.8B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $4.3B | $5.9B | $3.2B | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $21.1B | $31.0B | $6.0B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.69x | 4.61x | 9.62x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,410 for LUV. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +71.5% total return vs RYAAY's +8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs RYAAY's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | +20.8% | +2.2% | +11.0% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | +71.5% | +49.2% | +42.3% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +111.0% | +125.1% | +52.0% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.2% | +84.8% | +107.2% | -15.9% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.3% | +120.5% | +162.2% | +19.4% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +28.3% | +31.1% | +15.0% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAL's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs RYAAY's 81.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.93x | 2.37x | 1.55x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.24 | $83.83 | $119.21 | $54.89 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.14 | $45.28 | $71.55 | $28.98 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.3% | +99.1% | +96.9% | +82.8% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 60.9 | 60.7 | 60.8 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 7.8M | 6.5M | 6.1M | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RYAAY as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", UAL as "Buy", LUV as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for RYAAY (target: $79) vs 4.1% for DAL (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs DAL's 0.81%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.50 | $86.45 | $140.20 | $48.74 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 44 | 47 | 45 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.8% | — | +1.6% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $0.67 | — | $0.72 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +11.4% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
UAL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). RYAAY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RYAAY vs DAL vs UAL vs LUV vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Southwest Airlines Co. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -15. 9% for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus LUV's +19. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning UAL is approximately -1283% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RYAAY leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 1. 6% for Southwest Airlines Co. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 1. 5% for LUV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAL leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RYAAY: 30. 1% to $78. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), RYAAY (1. 6% yield), LUV (1. 6% yield), DAL (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. UAL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYAAY or DAL or UAL or LUV or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, UAL: +162. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYAAY and DAL and UAL and LUV and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYAAY (Industrials) and DAL (Industrials) and UAL (Industrials) and LUV (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYAAY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LUV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. RYAAY, DAL, LUV, KO, JPM pay a dividend while UAL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.