Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Banks - Diversified
RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $31.49B | $350.33B | $355.61B | $247.16B | $172.68B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.59B | $48.35B | $49.28B | $90.37B | $92.18B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.17B | $8.66B | $13.70B | $7.26B | $2.27B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 34.8% | 61.7% | 20.2% | 4.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 18.5% | 29.3% | 10.4% | -5.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 44.4x | 25.3x | 26.4x | 88.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $20.49B | $45.49B | $39.51B | $54.43B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $12.39B | $10.27B | $7.43B | $10.92B | $343.34B |
RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) | 100 | 227.3 | +127.3% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 986.2 | +886.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 297.8 | +197.8% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYAAY doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
GE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +40.4% vs BA's +7.5%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs BA's 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%
- 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
RTX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.52, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.52 vs GE's 1.29, lower leverage
BA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 34.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs RTX's 242.8%
- PEG 0.81 vs GE's 3.76
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 88.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 88.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs BA's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs GE's 1.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.4% vs BA's +7.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5% |
RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • RYAAY leads 1 • GE leads 1 • RTX leads 0 • BA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 18.0x RYAAY's $15.6B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BA's 2.5%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.6B | $48.4B | $49.3B | $90.4B | $92.2B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.7B | $9.9B | $15.5B | $13.8B | -$3.4B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.2B | $8.7B | $13.7B | $7.3B | $2.3B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $7.5B | $12.6B | $8.4B | -$1.0B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +34.8% | +61.7% | +20.2% | +4.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +18.5% | +29.3% | +10.4% | -5.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +17.9% | +27.8% | +8.0% | +2.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +15.4% | +25.5% | +9.2% | -1.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +24.7% | +12.1% | +8.7% | +14.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.0% | -1.1% | +18.2% | +32.5% | +31.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, RYAAY trades at a 86% valuation discount to BA's 88.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs GE's 3.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31.5B | $350.3B | $355.6B | $247.2B | $172.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.0B | $358.4B | $390.8B | $279.2B | $216.2B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.72x | 41.09x | 27.18x | 37.00x | 88.33x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.78x | 44.40x | 25.27x | 26.43x | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.48x | 2.43x | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.73x | 35.88x | 26.39x | 21.67x | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 7.64x | 7.42x | 2.79x | 1.93x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | 18.93x | 10.40x | 3.71x | 30.60x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.01x | 48.23x | 67.15x | 31.13x | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAAY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. RYAAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYAAY scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.6% | +45.8% | +41.1% | +10.9% | +2.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +6.8% | +13.1% | +4.3% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.3% | +24.7% | +15.8% | +6.7% | -9.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.1% | +9.6% | +17.3% | +7.9% | -9.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 1.08x | 1.33x | 0.59x | 9.97x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $8.1B | $35.2B | $32.1B | $43.5B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $12.4B | $10.3B | $7.4B | $10.9B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $20.5B | $45.5B | $39.5B | $54.4B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.69x | 10.70x | 5.58x | 1.89x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $50,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,936 for BA. Over the past 12 months, GE leads with a +40.4% total return vs BA's +7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 58.7% vs BA's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | +4.7% | +20.3% | -1.2% | -3.8% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | +40.4% | +17.2% | +32.1% | +7.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +299.6% | +47.0% | +92.4% | -1.1% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.2% | +405.4% | +65.6% | +120.5% | -10.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.3% | +144.1% | +121.1% | +242.8% | +87.8% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +58.7% | +13.7% | +24.4% | -0.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GE's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RYAAY's 81.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.29x | -0.20x | 0.52x | 1.12x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.24 | $348.48 | $84.04 | $214.50 | $254.35 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.14 | $232.24 | $65.35 | $140.13 | $176.77 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.3% | +96.2% | +98.3% | +85.6% | +86.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 61.9 | 60.6 | 57.0 | 50.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 4.9M | 12.7M | 4.7M | 6.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RYAAY as "Buy", GE as "Buy", KO as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", BA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for RYAAY (target: $79) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs BA's 0.20%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.50 | $380.14 | $86.13 | $224.33 | $281.56 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 34 | 48 | 26 | 54 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.4% | +2.5% | +1.4% | +0.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 56 | 33 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $1.36 | $2.04 | $2.63 | $0.43 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +2.2% | +0.2% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
RYAAY vs GE vs KO vs RTX vs BA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) is the cheapest at 12.
7x versus The Boeing Company at 88. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +405.
4%, compared to -10. 6% for The Boeing Company (BA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus BA's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus GE Aerospace's 1. 29β — meaning GE is approximately -744% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 5% for The Boeing Company — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -6. 1% for BA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 44. 4x for GE Aerospace — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RYAAY: 30. 1% to $78. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 2% for The Boeing Company (BA).
09Is RYAAY or GE or KO or RTX or BA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, GE: +144. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYAAY and GE and KO and RTX and BA and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYAAY (Industrials) and GE (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and RTX (Industrials) and BA (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYAAY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. RYAAY, KO, RTX, JPM pay a dividend while GE, BA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.