RYI vs CMC vs NUE vs RS

For growth investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger pick with 5.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI). Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (18. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Commercial Metals Company (CMC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Commercial Metals Company at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nucor Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Nucor Corporation (NUE) delivered a total return of +140.

0%, compared to +55. 6% for Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RS returned +463. 7% versus RYI's +169. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Commercial Metals Company's 1. 53β — meaning CMC is approximately 105% more volatile than RS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 103% for Ryerson Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is pulling ahead at 5.

7% versus -10. 0% for Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -106. 3% for Ryerson Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

4% net margin versus -0. 2% for Ryerson Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUE leads at 8. 2% versus 0. 7% for RYI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RS leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RYI: 33. 8% to $31. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 1. 0% for Nucor Corporation (NUE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 3% yield, +463. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +463. 7%, RYI: +169. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (RYI (Industrials) and CMC (Basic Materials) and NUE (Basic Materials) and RS (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RYI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.