REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SAFE vs GTY vs NNN vs LAND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Industrial
SAFE vs GTY vs NNN vs LAND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $2.00B | $8.47B | $354M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $227M | $936M | $76M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $91M | $387M | $-10M |
| Gross Margin | 97.7% | 27.3% | 81.4% | 87.4% |
| Operating Margin | 39.8% | 58.7% | 63.3% | 78.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 22.0x | 21.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $1.06B | $4.82B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $13M | $5M | $27M |
SAFE vs GTY vs NNN vs LAND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safehold Inc. (SAFE) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAFE vs GTY vs NNN vs LAND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.44 vs NNN's 1.94
- Better valuation composite
GTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.8%
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 8.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- 133.4% 10Y total return vs LAND's 42.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 98.5%, current ratio 29.85x
NNN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 41.4% margin vs LAND's -13.8%
LAND is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs LAND's -13.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs SAFE's 0.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.6% vs SAFE's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs LAND's -0.8%, ROIC 4.6% vs 4.9% |
SAFE vs GTY vs NNN vs LAND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAFE leads in 1 of 6 categories
LAND leads 1 • GTY leads 1 • NNN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GTY and LAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN is the larger business by revenue, generating $936M annually — 12.3x LAND's $76M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAND's -13.8%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $227M | $936M | $76M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $197M | $867M | $94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | $91M | $387M | -$10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $131M | $464M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.7% | +27.3% | +81.4% | +87.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +58.7% | +63.3% | +78.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +40.1% | +41.4% | -13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +57.8% | +49.6% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +10.5% | +4.1% | +38.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +76.0% | -2.0% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SAFE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, SAFE trades at a 60% valuation discount to GTY's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SAFE offers better value at 1.53x vs NNN's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.0B | $8.5B | $354M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $3.0B | $13.3B | $327M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.70x | 24.45x | 21.50x | -33.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.09x | 21.99x | 21.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.53x | — | 1.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.64x | 16.54x | 15.85x | 3.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 9.00x | 9.14x | 4.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.74x | 1.90x | 0.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.16x | 15.71x | 12.69x | 50.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAND leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LAND. GTY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAFE's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTY scores 5/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +8.8% | +8.8% | -1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +4.3% | +4.1% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +4.6% | +4.8% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +6.3% | +6.4% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 0.98x | 1.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $1.0B | $4.8B | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $13M | $5M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $1.1B | $4.8B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.57x | 2.71x | 2.93x | 2.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTY five years ago would be worth $13,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,904 for SAFE. Over the past 12 months, GTY leads with a +23.6% total return vs SAFE's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNN at 4.8% vs SAFE's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +21.5% | +15.6% | +8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | +23.6% | +12.4% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +12.4% | +15.1% | -27.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +32.2% | +15.0% | -43.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +133.4% | +37.8% | +42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | +4.0% | +4.8% | -10.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTY and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAFE's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LAND's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.05x | 0.15x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.16 | $34.75 | $46.03 | $13.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $25.39 | $38.90 | $8.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +95.0% | +96.7% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 48.6 | 58.4 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 415K | 1.5M | 543K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NNN and LAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAFE as "Buy", GTY as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", LAND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.5% upside for NNN (target: $46) vs -9.2% for SAFE (target: $14). For income investors, LAND offers the higher dividend yield at 6.74% vs SAFE's 4.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $34.00 | $46.06 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 | 29 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +5.8% | +5.3% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 8 | 9 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $1.92 | $2.36 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SAFE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LAND leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SAFE vs GTY vs NNN vs LAND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the stronger pick with 9. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Safehold Inc. (SAFE) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safehold Inc. (SAFE) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND?
On trailing P/E, Safehold Inc.
(SAFE) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Getty Realty Corp. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Safehold Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Safehold Inc. wins at 1. 44x versus NNN REIT, Inc. 's 1. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND?
Over the past 5 years, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) delivered a total return of +32. 2%, compared to -71. 0% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTY returned +133. 4% versus SAFE's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Safehold Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning SAFE is approximately 1755% more volatile than GTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 184% for Safehold Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is pulling ahead at 9. 0% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Getty Realty Corp. grew EPS 8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAFE leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -13. 8% for Gladstone Land Corporation — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAFE leads at 79. 8% versus 54. 9% for GTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAFE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Safehold Inc. (SAFE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 44x versus NNN REIT, Inc. 's 1. 94x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Safehold Inc. (SAFE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Getty Realty Corp. — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNN: 3. 5% to $46. 06.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 4. 6% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE).
09Is SAFE or GTY or NNN or LAND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 5. 8% yield, +133. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTY: +133. 4%, SAFE: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAFE and GTY and NNN and LAND?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAFE is a small-cap deep-value stock; GTY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.