SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+6.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SAIC vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RTX
RTX Corporation
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$238.07B
5Y Perf.+174.0%
SAIC vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SAIC | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $4.24B | $238.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.26B | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $358M | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $217M | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $182M | $7.43B |
SAIC vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SAIC
RTX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Science Application… (SAIC) | 100 | 106.9 | +6.9% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAIC vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SAIC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. RTX Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
The Income Pick
SAIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.26, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.20x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RTX
RTX Corporation
The Growth Play
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 39.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- 234.7% 10Y total return vs SAIC's 104.4%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs SAIC's -2.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RTX | 9.7% revenue growth vs SAIC's -2.9% |
| Value | SAIC | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 25.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | RTX | 8.0% margin vs SAIC's 4.9% |
| Stability / Safety | SAIC | Beta 0.26 vs RTX's 0.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SAIC | 1.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs RTX's 1.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | RTX | +40.8% vs SAIC's -20.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SAIC | 6.8% ROA vs RTX's 4.3%, ROIC 14.2% vs 6.7% |
SAIC vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
SAIC vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSAICLAGGINGRTX
RTXRTX Corporation
2leads
SAICScience Applications …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RTXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RTX6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SAIC6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SAIC7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RTX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 12.4x SAIC's $7.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.0% (RTX) to 4.9% (SAIC). On growth, RTX holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SAICScience Applicati… | RTXRTX Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.3B | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $666M | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $358M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $609M | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | +32.5% |
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SAIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SAIC trades at a 66% valuation discount to RTX's 35.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAIC's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RTX's 21.0x.
| Metric | SAICScience Applicati… | RTXRTX Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $238.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $270.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.22x | 35.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.33x | 25.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.43x | 20.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.92x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.34x | 29.98x |
SAIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAIC delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. SAIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RTX's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs SAIC's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SAICScience Applicati… | RTXRTX Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.7% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35M | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $182M | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $217M | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.99x | 5.58x |
SAIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RTX five years ago would be worth $22,007 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,243 for SAIC. Over the past 12 months, RTX leads with a +40.8% total return vs SAIC's -20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RTX at 24.5% vs SAIC's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SAICScience Applicati… | RTXRTX Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.9% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.8% | +93.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +120.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.4% | +234.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | +24.5% |
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAIC and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RTX's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RTX currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs SAIC's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SAICScience Applicati… | RTXRTX Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $124.11 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $81.08 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.8% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 563K | 5.3M |
Evenly matched — SAIC and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SAIC and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SAIC as "Hold" and RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for RTX (target: $225) vs 3.6% for SAIC (target: $98). For income investors, SAIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs RTX's 1.49%.
| Metric | SAICScience Applicati… | RTXRTX Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $97.50 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.51 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.5% | +0.0% |
Evenly matched — SAIC and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
RTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SAIC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallScience Applications Intern… (SAIC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SAIC vs RTX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAIC or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger pick with 9.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RTX Corporation (RTX) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAIC or RTX?
On trailing P/E, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus RTX Corporation at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Science Applications International Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAIC or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +120.
1%, compared to +12. 4% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +234. 7% versus SAIC's +104. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAIC or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
26β versus RTX Corporation's 0. 51β — meaning RTX is approximately 93% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 59% for RTX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAIC or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RTX Corporation (RTX) is pulling ahead at 9.
7% versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RTX Corporation grew EPS 39. 7% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for Science Applications International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RTX leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAIC or RTX?
RTX Corporation (RTX) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
6% net margin versus 4. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RTX leads at 10. 0% versus 7. 1% for SAIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RTX leads at 20. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAIC or RTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for RTX Corporation — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27. 2% to $224. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAIC or RTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 1. 5% for RTX Corporation (RTX).
09Is SAIC or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
26), 1. 6% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIC: +104. 4%, RTX: +234. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAIC and RTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAIC (Technology) and RTX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SAIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SAIC: -4.8% · RTX: 8.7%)Net Margin>
%
(SAIC: 4.9% · RTX: 8.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SAIC: 12.2x · RTX: 35.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.