Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $21M | $134M | $498M | $547M | $3.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $28M | $127M | $2.46B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $4M | $33M | $-91M | $289M |
| Gross Margin | -18.2% | 66.3% | 64.5% | 23.1% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | -142.7% | 17.4% | 24.1% | 2.1% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.5x | 22.9x | — | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $395K | $9M | $2.16B | $1.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $29M | $48M | $106M | $1.02B |
SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 137.6 | +37.6% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| Itron, Inc. (ITRI) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAIH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs ITRI's 94.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 8.86x
ERII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 25.9% margin vs SAIH's -106.2%
- 15.2% ROA vs SAIH's -32.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -38.9%
FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth 88.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
ITRI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs SAIH's -106.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SAIH's -32.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -38.9% |
SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRI leads in 2 of 6 categories
CODA leads 1 • FWRD leads 1 • SAIH leads 0 • ERII leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CODA and ERII each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FWRD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 444.5x SAIH's $6M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIH's -106.2%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $28M | $127M | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $6M | $41M | $206M | $367M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $4M | $33M | -$91M | $289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $7M | $27M | $38M | $393M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +66.3% | +64.5% | +23.1% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -142.7% | +17.4% | +24.1% | +2.1% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | +14.8% | +25.9% | -3.7% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -113.1% | +24.6% | +21.4% | +1.6% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +28.8% | -97.5% | -5.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.0% | +100.0% | +35.1% | -16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, ITRI trades at a 61% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ITRI's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $134M | $498M | $547M | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $106M | $460M | $2.6B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.22x | 32.16x | 22.45x | -4.98x | 12.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | 22.91x | — | 13.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.85x | 16.23x | 13.75x | 10.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 5.05x | 3.70x | 0.22x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.30x | 2.48x | 3.32x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.20x | 28.57x | 35.82x | 9.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERII delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs SAIH's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.7% | +7.2% | +17.4% | -52.6% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.2% | +6.6% | +15.2% | -3.3% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.9% | +11.2% | +10.3% | +1.2% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.1% | +8.1% | +11.3% | +1.5% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.01x | 0.05x | 13.36x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$28M | -$39M | $2.1B | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $29M | $48M | $106M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $394,932 | $9M | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 0.32x | 14.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $767 for SAIH. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | +25.1% | -31.3% | -31.0% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.2% | +78.9% | -37.3% | +0.6% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +34.5% | -60.0% | -81.3% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | +49.7% | -54.3% | -80.2% | -7.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | +844.4% | -11.9% | -47.3% | +94.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | +10.4% | -26.3% | -42.8% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAIH and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CODA is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIH currently trades 72.4% from its 52-week high vs ERII's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.00x | 1.53x | 2.28x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.41 | $17.28 | $18.32 | $32.47 | $142.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.00 | $5.98 | $9.30 | $14.81 | $78.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.4% | +68.9% | +51.5% | +53.4% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 48.6 | 60.6 | 42.4 | 35.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 256K | 996K | 733K | 893K |
Analyst Outlook
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", ERII as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold", ITRI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | $13.00 | $37.00 | $137.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 16 | 21 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% | +0.2% | +2.8% |
ITRI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CODA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SAIH vs CODA vs ERII vs FWRD vs ITRI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI?
On trailing P/E, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Itron, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -92. 3% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus SAIH's -92. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 128% more volatile than CODA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 0% for Energy Recovery, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRD leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -106. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERII leads at 18. 2% versus -142. 7% for SAIH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Energy Recovery, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SAIH or CODA or ERII or FWRD or ITRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), +844. 4% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CODA: +844. 4%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAIH and CODA and ERII and FWRD and ITRI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAIH (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and ERII (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials) and ITRI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SAIH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.