Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Industrial - Machinery
Waste Management
Industrial - Machinery
SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Industrial - Machinery | Waste Management | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $21M | $498M | $4.41B | $207M | $12.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $127M | $2.18B | $59M | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $33M | $150M | $-18M | $671M |
| Gross Margin | -18.2% | 64.5% | 35.2% | 4.1% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | -142.7% | 24.1% | 12.6% | -26.3% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.9x | 21.8x | — | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $9M | $280M | $4M | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $48M | $100M | $12M | $102M |
SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 117.0 | +17.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAIH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +54.2% vs ERII's -37.3%
ERII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 25.9% margin vs SAIH's -106.2%
- 15.2% ROA vs SAIH's -32.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -38.9%
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- 5.4% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2%
- Beta 0.92 vs PESI's 1.85
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs FELE's 231.4%
PNR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 1.3%
- PEG 1.13 vs FELE's 2.50
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs SAIH's -106.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs PNR's 1.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SAIH's -32.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -38.9% |
SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ERII leads in 1 of 6 categories
PNR leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • SAIH leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 758.1x SAIH's $6M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIH's -106.2%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $127M | $2.2B | $59M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $41M | $322M | -$14M | $983M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $33M | $150M | -$18M | $671M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $27M | $169M | -$14M | $716M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +64.5% | +35.2% | +4.1% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -142.7% | +24.1% | +12.6% | -26.3% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | +25.9% | +6.9% | -30.1% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -113.1% | +21.4% | +7.8% | -23.4% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -97.5% | +9.9% | -20.1% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +100.0% | +13.4% | -110.5% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 35% valuation discount to FELE's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PNR offers better value at 1.52x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $498M | $4.4B | $207M | $12.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $460M | $4.6B | $200M | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.22x | 22.45x | 30.75x | -14.89x | 19.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.91x | 21.77x | — | 14.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.53x | — | 1.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.23x | 13.82x | — | 14.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 3.70x | 2.07x | 3.36x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.48x | 3.41x | 4.11x | 3.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 28.57x | 22.81x | — | 17.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ERII and FELE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-38 for SAIH. ERII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNR's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs SAIH's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.7% | +17.4% | +11.4% | -34.5% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.2% | +15.2% | +7.6% | -20.2% | +9.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.9% | +10.3% | +14.7% | -21.7% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.1% | +11.3% | +18.1% | -16.7% | +15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.05x | 0.21x | 0.09x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$39M | $181M | -$7M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $48M | $100M | $12M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $9M | $280M | $4M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 24.75x | -42.14x | 11.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SAIH and PNR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $767 for SAIH. Over the past 12 months, SAIH leads with a +54.2% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNR at 11.8% vs SAIH's -38.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -31.3% | +3.6% | -8.8% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.2% | -37.3% | +17.7% | +26.2% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | -60.0% | +10.0% | +21.7% | +39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -54.3% | +20.3% | +45.6% | +23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -11.9% | +231.4% | +178.6% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | -26.3% | +3.2% | +6.8% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs ERII's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.53x | 0.92x | 1.85x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.41 | $18.32 | $111.53 | $16.50 | $113.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.00 | $9.30 | $83.42 | $8.02 | $77.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.4% | +51.5% | +89.6% | +67.7% | +69.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 60.6 | 54.8 | 41.5 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 996K | 281K | 164K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ERII as "Buy", FELE as "Hold", PESI as "Hold", PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 0.1% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, PNR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.26% vs FELE's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 | $100.00 | $18.00 | $113.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 11 | 1 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 32 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.11 | — | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.2% | +3.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
ERII leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PNR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SAIH vs ERII vs FELE vs PESI vs PNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pentair plc wins at 1. 13x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -92. 3% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FELE returned +231. 4% versus SAIH's -92. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 102% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 42% for Pentair plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 8% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ERII leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -106. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus -142. 7% for SAIH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERII leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pentair plc (PNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Energy Recovery, Inc. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR?
In this comparison, PNR (1.
3% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SAIH, ERII, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SAIH or ERII or FELE or PESI or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 1% yield, +231. 4% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +231. 4%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAIH and ERII and FELE and PESI and PNR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAIH (Technology) and ERII (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and PNR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
FELE, PNR pay a dividend while SAIH, ERII, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.