Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Engineering & Construction
Renewable Utilities
SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Renewable Utilities | Engineering & Construction | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $21M | $716M | $1.57B | $2.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $217M | $1.98B | $2.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-115M | $31M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | -18.2% | 22.1% | 15.6% | 11.7% |
| Operating Margin | -142.7% | -35.8% | 6.3% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $95M | $1.95B | $391M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $58M | $72M | $691M |
SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAIH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.45
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 18.7%, current ratio 2.96x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 2.96x
- Beta 1.45 vs FLNC's 3.55, lower leverage
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2%
- +447.1% vs SAIH's +54.2%
AMRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs FLNC's -45.8%
- 1.6% margin vs SAIH's -106.2%
- 0.7% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs -49.5%
FLNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.6% margin vs SAIH's -106.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs FLNC's 3.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs SAIH's +54.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs -49.5% |
SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMRC leads in 1 of 6 categories
NRGV leads 1 • SAIH leads 1 • FLNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NRGV and AMRC and FLNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 466.3x SAIH's $6M. AMRC is the more profitable business, keeping 1.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIH's -106.2%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $217M | $2.0B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$72M | $204M | -$19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$115M | $31M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$98M | -$251M | -$269M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +22.1% | +15.6% | +11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -142.7% | -35.8% | +6.3% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | -53.0% | +1.6% | -1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -113.1% | -45.2% | -12.7% | -10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +156.4% | +13.8% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -42.9% | -2.5% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SAIH and AMRC and FLNC each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $716M | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $752M | $3.4B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.22x | -6.37x | 35.76x | -51.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.00x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 3.52x | 0.81x | 1.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 7.50x | 1.41x | 4.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRC delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. SAIH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRGV scores 4/9 vs SAIH's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.7% | -146.8% | +2.9% | -8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.2% | -40.3% | +0.7% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.9% | -49.5% | +3.3% | -15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.1% | -53.7% | +3.7% | -5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 1.07x | 1.73x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $36M | $1.9B | -$300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $58M | $72M | $691M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $95M | $1.9B | $391M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -10.33x | 1.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMRC five years ago would be worth $5,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $767 for SAIH. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs SAIH's +54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs SAIH's -38.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -15.3% | -3.2% | -17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.2% | +447.1% | +134.3% | +320.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +140.7% | -29.9% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -57.7% | -44.0% | -45.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -57.1% | +542.4% | -45.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | +34.0% | -11.2% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SAIH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAIH is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLNC's 3.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIH currently trades 72.4% from its 52-week high vs FLNC's 56.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 3.08x | 2.03x | 3.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.41 | $6.35 | $44.93 | $33.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.00 | $0.65 | $12.37 | $3.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.4% | +65.2% | +66.1% | +56.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 53.3 | 68.0 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 3.7M | 507K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy", FLNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for AMRC (target: $43) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.75 | $43.17 | $19.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 23 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
AMRC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NRGV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SAIH vs NRGV vs AMRC vs FLNC: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC?
Over the past 5 years, Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) delivered a total return of -44. 0%, compared to -92. 3% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus SAIH's -92. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
45β versus Fluence Energy, Inc. 's 3. 55β — meaning FLNC is approximately 145% more volatile than SAIH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -408. 3% for Fluence Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNC leads at 23. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC?
Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -106. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMRC leads at 6. 5% versus -142. 7% for SAIH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRGV leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRC: 45.
5% to $43. 17.
07Which pays a better dividend — SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SAIH or NRGV or AMRC or FLNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIH: -92. 3%, NRGV: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SAIH and NRGV and AMRC and FLNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAIH (Technology) and NRGV (Utilities) and AMRC (Industrials) and FLNC (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SAIH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.