Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Agricultural Inputs
SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $43K | $1.04T | $57.36B | $9M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $102M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -44.5% | 4.1% | 5.3% | -72.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x | 15.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $54M | $67.09B | $5.59B | $54M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $294K | $10.73B | $5.49B | $16M |
SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&W Seed Company (SANW) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.9 | +2.9% |
| Origin Agritech Lim… (SEED) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SANW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs TGT's 99.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
TGT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.94x
- Better valuation composite
- 3.8% margin vs SANW's -85.4%
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SEED lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs SEED's -20.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs SANW's -85.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs SANW's -99.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs SANW's -46.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -12.0% |
SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 3 of 6 categories
WMT leads 1 • SANW leads 0 • SEED leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 18619.9x SANW's $38M. TGT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SANW's -85.4%. On growth, SEED holds the edge at +75.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $102M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $42.8B | $8.7B | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $22.9B | $4.0B | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $497,701 | $15.3B | $2.9B | -$40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +5.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.5% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -72.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -85.4% | +3.3% | +3.8% | -42.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +2.2% | +2.8% | -39.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +75.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +35.1% | +23.7% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TGT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGT's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43,117 | $1.04T | $57.4B | $9M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54M | $1.09T | $57.5B | $14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 47.69x | 15.49x | -1.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x | 15.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x | 7.26x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 10.45x | 3.55x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x | 20.23x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-120 for SANW. TGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SANW's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs SEED's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -120.2% | +22.3% | +26.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -46.3% | +7.9% | +6.9% | -42.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.0% | +14.7% | +16.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.8% | +17.5% | +13.6% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.67x | 0.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54M | $56.4B | $104M | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $294,014 | $10.7B | $5.5B | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $67.1B | $5.6B | $54M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.41x | 11.85x | 12.40x | -23.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for SANW. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs SANW's -99.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs SANW's -90.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -71.3% | +15.7% | +26.4% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.6% | +32.7% | +36.6% | -1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +160.5% | -11.0% | -81.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +186.9% | -31.6% | -91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +499.5% | +99.5% | -93.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.8% | +37.6% | -3.8% | -43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SANW and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SANW is the less volatile stock with a -3.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SANW's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -3.79x | 0.12x | 0.95x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.00 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $2.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $0.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +45.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.6 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 686 | 17.2M | 4.5M | 93K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.3% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs -8.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $115.31 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +3.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 22 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
TGT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SANW vs WMT vs TGT vs SEED: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 5% for Origin Agritech Limited (SEED). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for S&W Seed Company (SANW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus SANW's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), S&W Seed Company (SANW) is the lower-risk stock at -3.
79β versus Target Corporation's 0. 95β — meaning TGT is approximately -125% more volatile than SANW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 121% for S&W Seed Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -20. 5% for Origin Agritech Limited (SEED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -319. 7% for Origin Agritech Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEED leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus -58. 4% for Origin Agritech Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus -58. 9% for SEED. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15.
7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 3% to $137. 04.
08Which pays a better dividend — SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SANW, SEED do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SANW or WMT or TGT or SEED better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, S&W Seed Company (SANW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3.
79)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SANW: -100. 0%, SEED: -93. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SANW and WMT and TGT and SEED?
These companies operate in different sectors (SANW (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and SEED (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SANW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SEED is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, TGT pay a dividend while SANW, SEED do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.