Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Aerospace & Defense
SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $8.65B | $24.38B | $70.14B | $3.20B | $316.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.25B | $4.63B | $9.11B | $1.15B | $48.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $294M | $713M | $1.97B | $161M | $8.66B |
| Gross Margin | 15.1% | 30.4% | 59.0% | 45.0% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 22.8% | 46.5% | 21.3% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.6x | 51.6x | 32.0x | 17.2x | 40.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.45B | $2.19B | $30.03B | $13M | $20.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $290M | $218M | $2.81B | $330M | $12.39B |
SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| StandardAero, Inc. (SARO) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| HEICO Corporation (HEI) | 100 | 118.2 | +18.2% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 95.4 | -4.6% |
| Hayward Holdings, I… (HAYW) | 100 | 90.8 | -9.2% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 176.2 | +76.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SARO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HEI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.2% 10Y total return vs TDG's 6.0%
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
- 21.6% margin vs SARO's 4.7%
HAYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.12 vs GE's 3.39
- Lower P/E (17.2x vs 40.0x), PEG 0.12 vs 3.39
GE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs HAYW's 6.7%
- +44.9% vs SARO's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs HAYW's 6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.2x vs 40.0x), PEG 0.12 vs 3.39 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs SARO's 4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SARO's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HEI's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.9% vs SARO's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SARO's 4.5%, ROIC 20.9% vs 8.7% |
SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories
HAYW leads 1 • GE leads 1 • SARO leads 0 • HEI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.4B annually — 42.1x HAYW's $1.1B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SARO's 4.7%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $4.6B | $9.1B | $1.1B | $48.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $709M | $1.2B | $4.6B | $301M | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $294M | $713M | $2.0B | $161M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $841M | $1.9B | $80M | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +30.4% | +59.0% | +45.0% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +22.8% | +46.5% | +21.3% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +15.4% | +21.6% | +14.0% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +18.1% | +20.6% | +7.0% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +14.4% | +13.9% | +11.5% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | +12.5% | -13.1% | +70.3% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HAYW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, HAYW trades at a 63% valuation discount to HEI's 59.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAYW offers better value at 0.16x vs HEI's 3.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.6B | $24.4B | $70.1B | $3.2B | $316.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.8B | $26.4B | $97.4B | $2.9B | $324.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.33x | 59.09x | 38.72x | 21.71x | 37.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.58x | 51.57x | 32.01x | 17.19x | 40.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.60x | 1.24x | 0.16x | 3.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.32x | 21.69x | 21.48x | 9.81x | 32.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 5.44x | 7.94x | 2.85x | 6.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.26x | 9.31x | — | 2.06x | 17.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.91x | 28.30x | 38.63x | 14.19x | 43.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HAYW and GE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAYW. HAYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SARO scores 8/9 vs GE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +12.9% | — | +10.3% | +45.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +7.9% | +8.6% | +5.2% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +12.6% | +20.9% | +10.2% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +14.0% | +20.8% | +8.6% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.50x | — | 0.01x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | $2.0B | $27.2B | -$316M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $290M | $218M | $2.8B | $330M | $12.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $2.2B | $30.0B | $13M | $20.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.50x | 8.32x | 2.55x | 4.07x | 11.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,302 for HAYW. Over the past 12 months, GE leads with a +44.9% total return vs SARO's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 56.0% vs SARO's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | -12.0% | -8.6% | -6.4% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | +8.1% | -3.7% | +7.3% | +44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | +71.7% | +86.7% | +27.3% | +280.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | +105.2% | +140.2% | -37.0% | +362.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | +823.0% | +595.3% | -13.1% | +121.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | +19.7% | +23.1% | +8.4% | +56.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDG and GE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SARO's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GE currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs SARO's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.04x | 0.79x | 1.14x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.48 | $361.69 | $1623.83 | $17.73 | $348.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.83 | $256.11 | $1123.61 | $13.04 | $208.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +80.1% | +76.5% | +83.3% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 60.7 | 56.5 | 51.5 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 698K | 370K | 2.2M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HEI and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SARO as "Hold", HEI as "Buy", TDG as "Buy", HAYW as "Hold", GE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.3% upside for SARO (target: $37) vs 6.7% for HAYW (target: $16). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $371.00 | $1617.88 | $15.75 | $386.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 34 | 39 | 10 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +13.3% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.23 | $165.45 | — | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.7% | +0.2% | +2.4% |
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HAYW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SARO vs HEI vs TDG vs HAYW vs GE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HEICO Corporation (HEI) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE?
On trailing P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus HEICO Corporation at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -37. 0% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HEI returned +823. 0% versus SARO's -20. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus StandardAero, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning SARO is approximately 61% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 6. 7% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: StandardAero, Inc. grew EPS 20. 9% year-over-year, compared to 25. 2% for TransDigm Group Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, HEI leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 4. 6% for StandardAero, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus 9. 1% for SARO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 51. 6x for HEICO Corporation — 34. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SARO: 42. 3% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SARO, HEI, HAYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SARO or HEI or TDG or HAYW or GE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +595. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +595. 3%, SARO: -20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SARO and HEI and TDG and HAYW and GE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SARO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HEI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock. TDG pays a dividend while SARO, HEI, HAYW, GE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.