REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $23.17B | $151.66B | $83.94B | $41.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.85B | $11.63B | $10.82B | $6.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $1.43B | $2.88B | $260M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 39.1% | 73.4% | -4.3% |
| Operating Margin | 47.6% | 4.4% | 44.2% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 29.4x | 79.7x | 27.5x | 118.1x |
| Total Debt | $15.32B | $21.38B | $44.96B | $13.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $432M | $5.03B | $1.47B | $741M |
SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBA Communications … (SBAC) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 427.2 | +327.2% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.8 | +147.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.25 vs AMT's 3.77
- Lower P/E (29.4x vs 118.1x)
- 35.7% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
- 9.0% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 10.0% vs 2.5%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 233.9% 10Y total return vs SBAC's 137.0%
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SBAC's 5.1%
- +45.8% vs AMT's -16.4%
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 3.7%
- 3.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SBAC's 2.0%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 184.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs SBAC's 0.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SBAC's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.4x vs 118.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.7% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SBAC's 0.16 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SBAC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.8% vs AMT's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 10.0% vs 2.5% |
SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SBAC leads in 3 of 6 categories
WELL leads 1 • AMT leads 1 • VTR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBAC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 4.1x SBAC's $2.9B. SBAC is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $11.6B | $10.8B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $2.8B | $6.9B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $1.4B | $2.9B | $260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $2.5B | $3.8B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +39.1% | +73.4% | -4.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +4.4% | +44.2% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +12.3% | +26.6% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +21.9% | +34.9% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +40.3% | +6.8% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.7% | +22.5% | +76.9% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SBAC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.3x trailing earnings, SBAC trades at a 86% valuation discount to VTR's 160.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBAC offers better value at 0.19x vs AMT's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.2B | $151.7B | $83.9B | $41.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38.1B | $168.0B | $127.4B | $53.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.29x | 155.73x | 33.42x | 160.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.36x | 79.69x | 27.49x | 118.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.19x | — | 4.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.61x | 67.37x | 18.36x | 24.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.23x | 14.22x | 7.88x | 7.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.40x | 8.16x | 3.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.72x | 53.25x | 22.18x | 31.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SBAC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBAC scores 7/9 vs VTR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.5% | +27.4% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | +2.3% | +4.5% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.0% | +0.5% | +6.9% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.5% | +0.6% | +8.6% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x | 4.34x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.9B | $16.3B | $43.5B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432M | $5.0B | $1.5B | $741M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.3B | $21.4B | $45.0B | $13.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 0.26x | 3.99x | 1.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,096 for SBAC. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +45.8% total return vs AMT's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 43.3% vs SBAC's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | +16.2% | +4.1% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.2% | +45.8% | -16.4% | +34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +194.0% | +3.6% | +94.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | +211.9% | -13.3% | +77.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.0% | +233.9% | +114.4% | +66.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | +43.3% | +1.2% | +24.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBAC's 0.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 0.13x | -0.04x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $245.16 | $219.59 | $234.33 | $88.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $162.41 | $142.65 | $165.08 | $61.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +98.6% | +76.9% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 57.6 | 49.2 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.6M | 2.9M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
AMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBAC as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", VTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 4.6% for WELL (target: $227). For income investors, AMT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.74% vs WELL's 1.28%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $230.14 | $226.50 | $216.33 | $90.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 34 | 49 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.3% | +3.7% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.45 | $2.76 | $6.73 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
SBAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WELL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SBAC vs WELL vs AMT vs VTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) offers the better valuation at 22. 3x trailing P/E (29. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR?
On trailing P/E, SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the cheapest at 22.
3x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 4x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SBA Communications Corporation wins at 0. 25x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to -19. 0% for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus VTR's +66. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus SBA Communications Corporation's 0. 16β — meaning SBAC is approximately -533% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 5. 1% for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR?
SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
4% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBAC leads at 48. 7% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 5x forward P/E versus 118. 1x for Ventas, Inc. — 90. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 20. 1% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is SBAC or WELL or AMT or VTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, SBAC: +137. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBAC and WELL and AMT and VTR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBAC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.