Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBC
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$329M
5Y Perf.-68.0%
INMD
InMode Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$882M
5Y Perf.-52.2%
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118M
5Y Perf.-92.3%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.+46.8%

SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBC logoSBC
INMD logoINMD
SKIN logoSKIN
AEYE logoAEYE
IndustryConsulting ServicesMedical - DevicesHousehold & Personal ProductsSoftware - Application
Market Cap$329M$882M$118M$100M
Revenue (TTM)$178M$375M$296M$40M
Net Income (TTM)$43M$87M$-6M$-3M
Gross Margin73.7%77.8%64.9%78.3%
Operating Margin33.3%21.3%-3.6%-7.9%
Forward P/E7.1x9.6x
Total Debt$12M$13M$379M$721K
Cash & Equiv.$125M$303M$233M$5M

SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBC
INMD
SKIN
AEYE
StockSep 22May 26Return
SBC Medical Group H… (SBC)10032.0-68.0%
InMode Ltd. (INMD)10047.8-52.2%
The Beauty Health C… (SKIN)1007.7-92.3%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)100146.8+46.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SBC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AudioEye, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SBC
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated
The Income Pick

SBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.76
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 3.01x
  • Beta 0.76, current ratio 3.01x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
INMD
InMode Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

INMD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 105.0% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company
The Quality Angle

SKIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Growth Play

AEYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
  • 14.5% revenue growth vs SKIN's -10.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAEYE logoAEYE14.5% revenue growth vs SKIN's -10.0%
ValueSBC logoSBCBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSBC logoSBC24.3% margin vs AEYE's -7.6%
Stability / SafetySBC logoSBCBeta 0.76 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SBC logoSBC+0.3% vs SKIN's -35.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SBC logoSBC13.5% ROA vs AEYE's -9.5%, ROIC 72.3% vs -42.4%

SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SBCSBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated

Segment breakdown not available.

INMDInMode Ltd.
FY 2025
Capital Equipment
100.0%$289M
SKINThe Beauty Health Company
FY 2025
Consumables
70.7%$213M
Delivery Systems
29.3%$88M
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M

SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSBCLAGGINGSKIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

INMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $375M annually — 9.3x AEYE's $40M. SBC is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEYE's -7.6%. On growth, AEYE holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSBC logoSBCSBC Medical Group…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$178M$375M$296M$40M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$62M$81M$9M-$504,000
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$43M$87M-$6M-$3M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M$91M$29M$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.7%+77.8%+64.9%+78.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.3%+21.3%-3.6%-7.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.3%+23.3%-2.0%-7.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-20.5%+24.2%+9.8%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.3%+5.3%-6.7%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.2%-30.8%+38.0%+29.0%
SBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SBC and SKIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.7x trailing earnings, SBC trades at a 32% valuation discount to INMD's 9.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SBC's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.

MetricSBC logoSBCSBC Medical Group…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$329M$882M$118M$100M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$216M$593M$264M$96M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS6.65x9.73x-5.69x-32.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.07x9.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.92x6.88x7331.15x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.60x2.38x0.39x2.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.59x1.33x2.02x20.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.17x10.46x3.17x
Evenly matched — SBC and SKIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SBC delivers a 17.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBC scores 7/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSBC logoSBCSBC Medical Group…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.5%+13.3%-9.4%-47.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.5%+11.8%-1.2%-9.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+72.3%+13.5%-6.8%-42.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+37.9%+12.1%-4.5%-17.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97374
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.02x6.20x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$113M-$289M$146M-$5M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$125M$303M$233M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12M$13M$379M$721,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense596.05x0.81x-2.79x
SBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AEYE five years ago would be worth $3,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, SBC leads with a +0.3% total return vs SKIN's -35.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEYE at 6.4% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBC logoSBCSBC Medical Group…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-25.9%-5.9%-35.0%-18.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.3%-2.1%-35.9%-27.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.9%-60.2%-91.7%+20.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.8%-63.9%-92.9%-60.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.8%+105.0%-91.6%+102.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-32.2%-26.4%-56.4%+6.4%
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBC and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INMD currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBC logoSBCSBC Medical Group…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x1.04x2.00x2.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.75$16.74$2.69$16.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.97$12.72$0.76$5.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.8%+83.2%+33.8%+49.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.939.852.161.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded87K804K760K194K
Evenly matched — SBC and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SBC as "Buy", INMD as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 180.4% upside for SBC (target: $9) vs 14.9% for INMD (target: $16).

MetricSBC logoSBCSBC Medical Group…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.00$16.00$1.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts11113
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+14.5%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AEYE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallSBC Medical Group Holdings … (SBC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBC vs INMD vs SKIN vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (SBC) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (SBC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE?

On trailing P/E, SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (SBC) is the cheapest at 6.

7x versus InMode Ltd. at 9. 7x. On forward P/E, SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE?

Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) delivered a total return of -60. 2%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INMD returned +105. 0% versus SKIN's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (SBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

76β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 201% more volatile than SBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -10. 0% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE?

InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -7. 6% for AudioEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBC leads at 34. 2% versus -7. 9% for AEYE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (SBC) trades at 7.

1x forward P/E versus 9. 6x for InMode Ltd. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBC: 180. 4% to $9. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SBC or INMD or SKIN or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (SBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

76)). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBC: -67. 8%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBC and INMD and SKIN and AEYE?

These companies operate in different sectors (SBC (Industrials) and INMD (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SBC

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INMD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SBC and INMD and SKIN and AEYE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SBC: -18.3% · INMD: 5.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(SBC: 24.3% · INMD: 23.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SBC: 6.7x · INMD: 9.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.