SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$1.47B
5Y Perf.-97.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SBET vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+122.1%
SBET vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SBET | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.47B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-735M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 93.2% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -20.0% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $86.81B |
SBET vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SBET
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SharpLink Gaming Lt… (SBET) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBET vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SBET and AMZN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
The Growth Play
SBET has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 53.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.3%
- 6.7% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 34.8x)
Best for: growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Income Pick
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.51
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs SBET's -98.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBET | 6.7% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Value | SBET | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 34.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs SBET's -26.2% |
| Stability / Safety | AMZN | Beta 1.51 vs SBET's 3.41 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SBET | +127.8% vs AMZN's +43.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs SBET's -49.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -35.2% |
SBET vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
SBET vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGSBET
SBETSharpLink Gaming Ltd.
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBETMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SBET3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
AMZN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SBET and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 26475.7x SBET's $28M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBET's -26.2%.
| Metric | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$561M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$735M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.2% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.0% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -65.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.3% | +74.8% |
Evenly matched — SBET and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SBET leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.01x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.11x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 52.23x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
SBET leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SBET. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs SBET's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -49.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.3% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $112 for SBET. Over the past 12 months, SBET leads with a +127.8% total return vs AMZN's +43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SBET's -42.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.1% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.8% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.4% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.9% | +36.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBET's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SBET's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.41x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $124.12 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.41 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.0% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 45.5M |
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SBET as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 128.2% upside for SBET (target: $17) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SBET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SBET vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBET or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) is the stronger pick with 666. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBET or AMZN?
On forward P/E, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBET or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -98. 9% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus SBET's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBET or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus SharpLink Gaming Ltd. 's 3. 41β — meaning SBET is approximately 126% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SBET or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) is pulling ahead at 666. 0% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SharpLink Gaming Ltd. grew EPS 53. 7% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBET leads at 100. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBET or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -26. 2% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -1999. 5% for SBET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBET leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBET or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 28. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBET: 128. 2% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBET or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SBET or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, SBET: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBET and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBET is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SBET: 1815.4% · AMZN: 16.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.