Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.47B
5Y Perf.-97.3%
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-69.0%
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.66B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.-56.2%

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBET logoSBET
PENN logoPENN
CZR logoCZR
GENI logoGENI
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.47B$2.24B$5.66B$1.17B
Revenue (TTM)$28M$6.96B$11.56B$669M
Net Income (TTM)$-735M$-843M$-485M$-112M
Gross Margin93.2%30.6%43.9%22.9%
Operating Margin-20.0%-7.9%17.8%-18.1%
Forward P/E6.1x22.8x52.4x
Total Debt$0.00$8.38B$26.34B$30M
Cash & Equiv.$29M$687M$887M$281M

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBET
PENN
CZR
GENI
StockOct 20May 26Return
SharpLink Gaming Lt… (SBET)1002.7-97.3%
PENN Entertainment,… (PENN)10031.0-69.0%
Caesars Entertainme… (CZR)10062.6-37.4%
Genius Sports Limit… (GENI)10043.8-56.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SBET and CZR are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
The Growth Play

SBET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 53.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.3%
  • 6.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
  • Lower P/E (6.1x vs 52.4x)
  • +127.8% vs GENI's -53.1%
Best for: growth exposure
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

PENN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CZR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 302.6% 10Y total return vs PENN's 11.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 0.80x
  • Beta 1.27, current ratio 0.80x
  • -4.2% margin vs SBET's -26.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Income Pick

GENI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSBET logoSBET6.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
ValueSBET logoSBETLower P/E (6.1x vs 52.4x)
Quality / MarginsCZR logoCZR-4.2% margin vs SBET's -26.2%
Stability / SafetyCZR logoCZRBeta 1.27 vs SBET's 3.41
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SBET logoSBET+127.8% vs GENI's -53.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CZR logoCZR-1.5% ROA vs SBET's -49.3%, ROIC 5.4% vs -35.2%

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SBETSharpLink Gaming Ltd.
FY 2025
Affiliate Marketing Services
100.0%$2M
PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
76.9%$5.3B
Product and Service, Other
13.1%$912M
Food and Beverage
6.4%$446M
Occupancy
3.6%$253M
CZRCaesars Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
64.4%$6.6B
Hotel, Owned
18.9%$1.9B
Food and Beverage
16.7%$1.7B
GENIGenius Sports Limited
FY 2025
Betting Technology Content And Services
70.4%$472M
Media Technology Content And Services
21.6%$144M
Sports Technology And Services
8.0%$53M

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCZRLAGGINGPENN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SBET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 412.1x SBET's $28M. CZR is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBET's -26.2%. On growth, SBET holds the edge at +18.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$28M$7.0B$11.6B$669M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$561M-$105M$3.5B-$50M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$735M-$843M-$485M-$112M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M-$169M$538M$37M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.2%+30.6%+43.9%+22.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-20.0%-7.9%+17.8%-18.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-26.2%-12.1%-4.2%-16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-65.1%-2.4%+4.7%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%+8.2%+2.7%+37.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.3%+37.5%+11.1%+33.8%
SBET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 13.8x.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$2.2B$5.7B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$9.9B$31.1B$924M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.01x-2.88x-11.48x-10.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.10x22.79x52.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.81x8.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue52.23x0.32x0.49x1.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.61x1.33x1.57x1.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.88x18.18x
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CZR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CZR delivers a -12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SBET. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-49.5%-34.7%-12.6%-15.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-49.3%-5.7%-1.5%-11.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-35.2%+1.8%+5.4%-16.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-46.3%+2.0%+7.0%-15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93553
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.58x7.15x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$29M$7.7B$25.5B-$250M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$687M$887M$281M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$8.4B$26.3B$30M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.02x0.90x-136.57x
CZR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZR five years ago would be worth $2,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $112 for SBET. Over the past 12 months, SBET leads with a +127.8% total return vs GENI's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 5.5% vs SBET's -42.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.1%+12.9%+17.9%-55.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+127.8%+6.7%+2.5%-53.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.4%-35.3%-38.6%+17.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.9%-80.6%-73.7%-74.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%+11.9%+302.6%-52.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-42.9%-13.5%-15.0%+5.5%
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CZR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZR is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBET's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZR currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs SBET's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.41x1.31x1.24x1.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$124.12$20.61$31.58$13.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.41$11.65$17.95$3.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.0%+81.4%+88.0%+34.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.655.154.545.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.9M4.4M4.6M5.6M
CZR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SBET as "Buy", PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", GENI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs 10.0% for CZR (target: $31).

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$20.29$30.57$12.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts3473019
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+15.8%+4.0%0.0%
GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CZR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SBET leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).

Best OverallCaesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

(SBET) is the stronger pick with 666. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Analysts rate SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI?

Over the past 5 years, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) delivered a total return of -73. 7%, compared to -98. 9% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +306. 4% versus SBET's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus SharpLink Gaming Ltd. 's 3. 41β — meaning SBET is approximately 176% more volatile than CZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

(SBET) is pulling ahead at 666. 0% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SharpLink Gaming Ltd. grew EPS 53. 7% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBET leads at 100. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI?

Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 4% net margin versus -26. 2% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -1999. 5% for SBET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBET leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

(SBET) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 52. 4x for Genius Sports Limited — 46. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), +306. 4% 10Y return). SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZR: +306. 4%, SBET: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SBET and PENN and CZR and GENI?

These companies operate in different sectors (SBET (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SBET is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SBET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 907%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PENN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GENI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SBET and PENN and CZR and GENI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SBET: 1815.4% · PENN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.