SBEV vs COKE

For growth investors, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -78. 0% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV). Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) delivered a total return of +530. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COKE returned +1005% versus SBEV's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Splash Beverage Group, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning SBEV is approximately 1535% more volatile than COKE relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -78. 0% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. grew EPS -2. 6% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COKE leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus -571. 7% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COKE leads at 13. 2% versus -386. 2% for SBEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COKE leads at 39. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, COKE (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. SBEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 0. 6% yield, +1005% 10Y return). Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COKE: +1005%, SBEV: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

COKE pays a dividend while SBEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.