Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $365M | $207M | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $196M | $90M | $902M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $27M | $14M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 60.9% | 54.7% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 18.8% | 7.0% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 17.1x | 11.8x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $77M | $52M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $244M | $119M | $185M |
SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB Financial Group,… (SBFG) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 213.7 | +113.7% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 167.5% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x)
MVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs NBTB's 0.76
- +52.1% vs NBTB's +18.3%
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- PEG 1.64 vs SBFG's 2.94
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MVBF's 2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs NBTB's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MVBF's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% |
SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
SBFG leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • MVBF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 10.0x CZWI's $90M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 13.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $196M | $90M | $902M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $39M | $9M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $27M | $14M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $2M | $11M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +60.9% | +54.7% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +18.8% | +7.0% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +13.7% | +16.0% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +1.0% | +12.4% | +24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | -55.6% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 28% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 2.06x vs SBFG's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $365M | $207M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $150M | $198M | $140M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 13.80x | 14.70x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.44x | 17.12x | 11.79x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.32x | — | 2.90x | 2.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | 5.38x | 15.69x | 11.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 1.35x | 2.29x | 2.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.12x | 1.11x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.85x | 172.76x | 19.90x | 11.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBFG delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBFG's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBFG scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +8.5% | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +7.0% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +8.2% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$167M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $244M | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $77M | $52M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 0.54x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,505 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs MVBF's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +13.0% | +24.3% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +42.0% | +52.1% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +48.2% | +153.7% | +48.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | -24.9% | +69.0% | +44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.5% | +166.6% | +149.0% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +14.0% | +36.4% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.65x | 0.50x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.93 | $29.59 | $22.62 | $48.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.10 | $20.00 | $12.83 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +96.0% | +94.9% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 61.4 | 51.2 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 38K | 41K | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MVBF as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.6% upside for MVBF (target: $30) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.00 | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.3% | +1.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 0 | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.66 | $0.37 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SBFG vs MVBF vs CZWI vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.
(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to -24. 9% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBFG returned +167. 5% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 53% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for SB Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for MVB Financial Corp. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVBF: 5. 6% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is SBFG or MVBF or CZWI or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBFG and MVBF and CZWI and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.