Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SBUX vs CMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
SBUX vs CMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $114.71B | $42.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.70B | $12.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.37B | $1.45B |
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | 36.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 15.8% |
| Forward P/E | 42.1x | 28.6x |
| Total Debt | $26.61B | $9.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.22B | $351M |
SBUX vs CMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBUX vs CMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBUX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.71, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.72x
CMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 2.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 309.1% 10Y total return vs SBUX's 114.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs SBUX's 2.70
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs SBUX's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.6x vs 42.1x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.0% margin vs SBUX's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs CMG's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.7% vs CMG's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs SBUX's 4.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs 17.7% |
SBUX vs CMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBUX vs CMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 3.1x CMG's $12.1B. CMG is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBUX's 3.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.7B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.1B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +36.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.3% | -17.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.5x trailing earnings, CMG trades at a 54% valuation discount to SBUX's 61.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMG offers better value at 0.80x vs SBUX's 3.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114.7B | $42.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138.1B | $51.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.75x | 28.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.10x | 28.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.96x | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.23x | 21.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 15.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.97x | 29.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMG scores 5/9 vs SBUX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | +25.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23.4B | $9.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $351M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26.6B | $9.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBUX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMG five years ago would be worth $11,606 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,188 for SBUX. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +11.7% total return vs CMG's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBUX at 2.1% vs CMG's -7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.7% | -37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.9% | +16.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.2% | +309.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SBUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBUX is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMG's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBUX currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs CMG's 55.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $108.86 | $58.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.99 | $28.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +55.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.5M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SBUX as "Buy" and CMG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for CMG (target: $43) vs 7.8% for SBUX (target: $109). SBUX is the only dividend payer here at 2.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $108.50 | $43.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 59 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.7% |
CMG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SBUX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
SBUX vs CMG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBUX or CMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) offers the better valuation at 28. 5x trailing P/E (28. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBUX or CMG?
On trailing P/E, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) is the cheapest at 28. 5x versus Starbucks Corporation at 61. 7x. On forward P/E, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBUX or CMG?
Over the past 5 years, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) delivered a total return of +16. 1%, compared to +1. 9% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMG returned +309. 1% versus SBUX's +114. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBUX or CMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CMG is approximately 34% more volatile than SBUX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SBUX or CMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 2. 8% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Starbucks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMG leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBUX or CMG?
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 5. 0% for Starbucks Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMG leads at 16. 9% versus 9. 6% for SBUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMG leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBUX or CMG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) trades at 28. 6x forward P/E versus 42. 1x for Starbucks Corporation — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMG: 32. 6% to $43. 06.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBUX or CMG?
In this comparison, SBUX (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SBUX or CMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 2. 4% yield, +114. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBUX: +114. 2%, CMG: +309. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBUX and CMG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SBUX pays a dividend while CMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons that include one of these companies.