SCCF
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.-2.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SCCF vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-59.8%
SCCF vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SCCF | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-13M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 400.0x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $20M |
SCCF vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SCCF
TPVG
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCF vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SCCF and TPVG are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SCCF
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not
The Real Estate Income Play
SCCF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66
- Beta 0.66, yield 0.8%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs SCCF's 25.4%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs SCCF's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TPVG | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs SCCF's -100.0% |
| Value | TPVG | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 400.0x) |
| Stability / Safety | SCCF | Beta 0.66 vs TPVG's 0.83 |
| Dividends | TPVG | 17.1% yield, vs SCCF's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SCCF | +33.5% vs TPVG's +19.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SCCF | 0.4% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5% |
SCCF vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSCCFLAGGINGTPVG
TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
2leads
SCCFSachem Capital Corp. …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TPVGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SCCF1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TPVG3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SCCF4/4
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SCCF5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SCCF2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TPVG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG and SCCF operate at a comparable scale, with $97M and -$13M in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$13M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133,999 | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.6% | -2.3% |
SCCF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 99% valuation discount to SCCF's 600.0x P/E.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 599.95x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 399.97x | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.43x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 457.74x | — |
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCF leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCF delivers a 1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.02x |
SCCF leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCF five years ago would be worth $12,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SCCF leads with a +33.5% total return vs TPVG's +19.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCF at 11.8% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.5% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | -1.2% |
SCCF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCF is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCF currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.00 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.81 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 504K |
SCCF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs SCCF's 0.84%.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SCCF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallSachem Capital Corp. 7.125%… (SCCF)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SCCF vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCF or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCF or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not at 600. 0x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCF or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) delivered a total return of +25. 4%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +93. 3% versus SCCF's +25. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCF or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 25% more volatile than SCCF relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SCCF or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -100. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to 48. 8% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCF or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for SCCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCCF or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 400. 0x for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not — 393. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCCF or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF).
09Is SCCF or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCF: +25. 4%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCCF and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCCF (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SCCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SCCF: -205.3% · TPVG: 36.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SCCF: 600.0x · TPVG: 4.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.