SCCG
Sachem Capital Corp. 8.00% Note
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.-3.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SCCG vs FBRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$696M
5Y Perf.-29.9%
SCCG vs FBRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SCCG | FBRT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $696M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $401M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $72M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 36.9% |
| Forward P/E | 397.8x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $167M |
SCCG vs FBRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SCCG
FBRT
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCG) | 100 | 96.1 | -3.9% |
| Franklin BSP Realty… (FBRT) | 100 | 70.1 | -29.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCG vs FBRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SCCG and FBRT are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SCCG
Sachem Capital Corp. 8.00% Note
The Real Estate Income Play
SCCG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth 104.3%
- 24.3% 10Y total return vs FBRT's -11.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
FBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 397.8x)
- 18.7% yield, vs SCCG's 0.8%
- 1.2% ROA vs SCCG's 0.4%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SCCG | -100.0% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0% |
| Value | FBRT | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 397.8x) |
| Stability / Safety | SCCG | Beta 0.09 vs FBRT's 0.74 |
| Dividends | FBRT | 18.7% yield, vs SCCG's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SCCG | +28.8% vs FBRT's -7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FBRT | 1.2% ROA vs SCCG's 0.4% |
SCCG vs FBRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SCCG vs FBRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSCCGLAGGINGFBRT
FBRTFranklin BSP Realty T…
3leads
SCCGSachem Capital Corp. …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBRTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SCCG1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBRT4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FBRT3/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SCCG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SCCG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FBRT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBRT and SCCG operate at a comparable scale, with $401M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | FBRTFranklin BSP Real… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $401M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $159M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $72M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $121M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +59.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +36.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.4% | -65.0% |
SCCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
FBRT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, FBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to SCCG's 596.8x P/E.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | FBRTFranklin BSP Real… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $696M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 596.75x | 14.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 397.83x | 8.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 48.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.40x | 0.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 455.30x | 2.38x |
FBRT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBRT delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $1 for SCCG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBRT scores 6/9 vs SCCG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | FBRTFranklin BSP Real… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $4.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
FBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCG five years ago would be worth $12,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,892 for FBRT. Over the past 12 months, SCCG leads with a +28.8% total return vs FBRT's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCG at 10.9% vs FBRT's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | FBRTFranklin BSP Real… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.8% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | +2.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | -11.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | -11.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | +0.8% |
SCCG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBRT's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCG currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FBRT's 76.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | FBRTFranklin BSP Real… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.55 | $11.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.58 | $8.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +76.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 918K |
SCCG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, FBRT offers the higher dividend yield at 18.68% vs SCCG's 0.85%.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | FBRTFranklin BSP Real… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +18.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% |
FBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SCCG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FBRT leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallSachem Capital Corp. 8.00% … (SCCG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SCCG vs FBRT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCG or FBRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is the stronger pick with -100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCG or FBRT?
On trailing P/E, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
(FBRT) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note at 596. 8x. On forward P/E, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCG or FBRT?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) delivered a total return of +24. 3%, compared to -11. 1% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCG returned +24. 3% versus FBRT's -11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCG or FBRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning FBRT is approximately 686% more volatile than SCCG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SCCG or FBRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is pulling ahead at -100. 0% versus -100. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to -22. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCG or FBRT?
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
(FBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBRT leads at 36. 9% versus 0. 0% for SCCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBRT leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCCG or FBRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
(FBRT) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 397. 8x for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note — 388. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCCG or FBRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) offers the highest yield at 18. 7%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG).
09Is SCCG or FBRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCG: +24. 3%, FBRT: -11. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCCG and FBRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCCG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBRT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SCCG: -205.3% · FBRT: -100.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SCCG: 596.8x · FBRT: 14.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.