Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$148.31B
5Y Perf.+374.2%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$125.72B
5Y Perf.+83.8%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.11B
5Y Perf.+423.9%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+593.4%

SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SCCO logoSCCO
NEM logoNEM
FCX logoFCX
MP logoMP
IndustryCopperGoldCopperIndustrial Materials
Market Cap$148.31B$125.72B$87.11B$12.28B
Revenue (TTM)$13.42B$17.23B$26.42B$305M
Net Income (TTM)$4.33B$5.26B$2.73B$-71M
Gross Margin56.7%52.1%27.8%8.3%
Operating Margin52.2%49.3%27.8%-36.4%
Forward P/E25.4x10.9x22.4x274.3x
Total Debt$7.41B$474M$11.50B$1.04B
Cash & Equiv.$4.30B$7.65B$3.35B$1.17B

SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SCCO
NEM
FCX
MP
StockJun 20May 26Return
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100474.2+374.2%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100183.8+83.8%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100523.9+423.9%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100693.4+593.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SCCO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Newmont Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. MP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Income Pick

SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs MP's 5.9%
  • Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
  • 32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Growth Play

NEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
  • Lower P/E (10.9x vs 274.3x)
  • Beta 0.75 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Value Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
Best for: valuation efficiency
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Growth Leader

MP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.

  • 35.1% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
  • +192.7% vs FCX's +65.3%
Best for: growth and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueNEM logoNEMLower P/E (10.9x vs 274.3x)
Quality / MarginsSCCO logoSCCO32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3%
Stability / SafetyNEM logoNEMBeta 0.75 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsSCCO logoSCCO1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MP logoMP+192.7% vs FCX's +65.3%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs MP's -2.0%, ROIC 38.6% vs -4.7%

SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M
NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B
FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M

SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSCCOLAGGINGFCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 86.5x MP's $305M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.4B$17.2B$26.4B$305M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7.9B$12.7B$9.6B-$43M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4.3B$5.3B$2.7B-$71M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.4B$12.9B$6.2B-$314M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.7%+52.1%+27.8%+8.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+52.2%+49.3%+27.8%-36.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.3%+30.5%+10.3%-23.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.5%+75.0%+23.6%-102.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%-100.0%+12.2%+49.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.5%-100.0%+154.2%+121.4%
SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NEM and FCX each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.7x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 56% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Market CapShares × price$148.3B$125.7B$87.1B$12.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$151.4B$118.6B$95.3B$12.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.26x17.70x39.88x-138.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.40x10.89x22.41x274.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.64x1.38x1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.24x9.03x11.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.05x5.69x3.38x44.59x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share13.55x3.69x2.84x4.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.28x17.22x78.05x
Evenly matched — NEM and FCX each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MP. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs MP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+42.0%+15.6%+8.9%-3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.4%+9.4%+4.7%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+38.6%+24.9%+12.8%-4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+39.2%+20.7%+12.4%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.67x0.01x0.37x0.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.1B-$7.2B$8.1B-$123M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.3B$7.6B$3.4B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.4B$474M$11.5B$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.33x50.54x17.68x-2.80x
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $26,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, MP leads with a +192.7% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 47.6% vs FCX's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.4%+12.4%+17.3%+25.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+110.5%+112.0%+65.3%+192.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+151.0%+142.1%+70.7%+221.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+167.4%+80.0%+44.3%+149.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+668.4%+293.1%+507.7%+591.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.9%+34.3%+19.5%+47.6%
MP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NEM and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs MP's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.78x0.75x1.79x1.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$223.89$134.88$70.97$100.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$85.72$48.27$35.15$18.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.2%+84.1%+85.4%+69.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.153.549.166.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M9.2M15.4M5.6M
Evenly matched — NEM and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SCCO as "Hold", NEM as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", MP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for NEM (target: $138) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs NEM's 0.88%.

MetricSCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$156.40$137.50$67.00$78.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts30364111
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+0.9%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.96$1.00$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.8%+0.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SCCO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NEM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallSouthern Copper Corporation (SCCO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SCCO vs NEM vs FCX vs MP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmont Corporation (NEM) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP?

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.

7x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP?

Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +167.

4%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +668. 4% versus NEM's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

75β versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FCX is approximately 137% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to 12. 3% for MP Materials Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 263. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEM: 21. 2% to $137. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP?

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), NEM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SCCO or NEM or FCX or MP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, MP: +591. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SCCO and NEM and FCX and MP?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, NEM, FCX pay a dividend while MP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SCCO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SCCO and NEM and FCX and MP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SCCO: 39.0% · NEM: -100.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SCCO: 32.3% · NEM: 30.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SCCO: 34.3x · NEM: 17.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.