Publishing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Publishing
Entertainment
Broadcasting
SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Publishing | Entertainment | Publishing | Entertainment | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $968M | $67.98B | $9.53B | $15.27B | $552M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.61B | $37.21B | $7.07B | $9.03B | $2.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $63M | $-2.15B | $790M | $1.69B | $-101M |
| Gross Margin | 52.3% | 41.5% | 51.0% | 34.9% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | -4.0% | 14.8% | 7.8% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 93.5x | 21.7x | 25.8x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $375M | $32.57B | $1.47B | $2.94B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $4.57B | $543M | $2.40B | $28M |
SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scholastic Corporat… (SCHL) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| Pearson plc (PSO) | 100 | 259.8 | +159.8% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| The E.W. Scripps Co… (SSP) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SCHL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WBD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +216.8% vs NWSA's -3.3%
PSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 36.3%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 0.38, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 0.38 vs SSP's 1.50, lower leverage
NWSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 350.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.6%
- 136.5% 10Y total return vs PSO's 56.6%
- 2.4% revenue growth vs SSP's -14.3%
- 18.7% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
SSP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (18.7x vs 25.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs SSP's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.7x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs SSP's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SCHL's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NWSA's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.7% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 1.5% |
SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SSP leads 1 • WBD leads 1 • SCHL leads 0 • NWSA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SCHL and PSO and NWSA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.2B annually — 23.1x SCHL's $1.6B. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $37.2B | $7.1B | $9.0B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $7.5B | $1.9B | $469M | $237M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $63M | -$2.2B | $790M | $1.7B | -$101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $2.3B | $1.1B | $572M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.3% | +41.5% | +51.0% | +34.9% | +33.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | -4.0% | +14.8% | +7.8% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -5.8% | +11.2% | +18.7% | -4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +6.2% | +16.1% | +6.3% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | -1.0% | -1.8% | +8.9% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | -5.5% | +8.7% | +6.1% | -155.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 86% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SSP's 285.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $968M | $68.0B | $9.5B | $15.3B | $552M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $96.0B | $10.8B | $15.8B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -581.25x | 93.52x | 17.59x | 13.06x | -2.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.03x | — | 21.70x | 25.75x | 18.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.34x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.26x | 13.73x | 7.44x | 11.17x | 285.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 1.82x | 1.97x | 1.81x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.85x | 1.87x | 1.64x | 0.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.45x | 22.02x | 13.93x | 21.00x | 84.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSO delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSP. NWSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SSP's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSO scores 7/9 vs SSP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | -5.9% | +21.9% | +18.1% | -7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -2.2% | +12.7% | +10.9% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +1.5% | +8.3% | +6.8% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +1.5% | +10.1% | +7.2% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.88x | 0.36x | 0.31x | 2.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $251M | $28.0B | $929M | $537M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $4.6B | $543M | $2.4B | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $375M | $32.6B | $1.5B | $2.9B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 3.56x | 5.19x | 127.43x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCHL five years ago would be worth $13,986 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,312 for SSP. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.3% vs SSP's -16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | -4.9% | +11.7% | +3.6% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.5% | +216.8% | -2.6% | -3.3% | +95.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.3% | +101.5% | +56.5% | +61.3% | -40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.9% | -27.8% | +39.7% | +2.2% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.1% | -3.7% | +56.6% | +136.5% | -66.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | +26.3% | +16.1% | +17.3% | -16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SCHL and PSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PSO is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSP's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCHL currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs NWSA's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.90x | 0.38x | 0.60x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.39 | $30.00 | $16.67 | $31.61 | $5.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.78 | $8.06 | $12.02 | $22.20 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +90.4% | +90.4% | +85.5% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 48.9 | 73.1 | 58.3 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 609K | 22.2M | 1.1M | 4.1M | 715K |
Analyst Outlook
PSO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SCHL as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", PSO as "Hold", NWSA as "Buy", SSP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -16.7% for SSP (target: $4). For income investors, PSO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs NWSA's 1.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.94 | $14.50 | $32.40 | $3.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 32 | 15 | 28 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | +2.1% | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | — | $0.23 | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | 0.0% | +5.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
PSO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). SSP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SCHL vs WBD vs PSO vs NWSA vs SSP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger pick with 2.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (25. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP?
On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, The E. W. Scripps Company is actually cheaper at 18. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP?
Over the past 5 years, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) delivered a total return of +39.
9%, compared to -76. 9% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 5% versus SSP's -66. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pearson plc (PSO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus The E. W. Scripps Company's 1. 50β — meaning SSP is approximately 298% more volatile than PSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 2% for The E. W. Scripps Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), News Corporation (NWSA) is pulling ahead at 2.
4% versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -285. 1% for The E. W. Scripps Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus -4. 7% for The E. W. Scripps Company — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSO leads at 15. 2% versus 1. 3% for SCHL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The E.
W. Scripps Company (SSP) trades at 18. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for News Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 19. 8% to $32. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP?
In this comparison, PSO (2.
1% yield), SCHL (2. 0% yield), NWSA (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. WBD, SSP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCHL or WBD or PSO or NWSA or SSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pearson plc (PSO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PSO: +56. 6%, SSP: -66. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCHL and WBD and PSO and NWSA and SSP?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCHL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SCHL, PSO, NWSA pay a dividend while WBD, SSP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 31%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.