SCI vs SPGI

For growth investors, S&P Global Inc.

(SPGI) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for Service Corporation International (SCI). Service Corporation International (SCI) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Service Corporation International (SCI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the cheapest at 20.

9x versus S&P Global Inc. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, Service Corporation International is actually cheaper at 19. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: S&P Global Inc. wins at 2. 48x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 34x.

Over the past 5 years, Service Corporation International (SCI) delivered a total return of +52.

6%, compared to +12. 6% for S&P Global Inc. (SPGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPGI returned +331. 8% versus SCI's +231. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Service Corporation International (SCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

11β versus S&P Global Inc. 's 0. 58β — meaning SPGI is approximately 408% more volatile than SCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 3% for Service Corporation International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), S&P Global Inc.

(SPGI) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus 2. 9% for Service Corporation International (SCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: S&P Global Inc. grew EPS 18. 7% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Service Corporation International. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

S&P Global Inc.

(SPGI) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 2% net margin versus 12. 6% for Service Corporation International — meaning it keeps 29. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPGI leads at 42. 2% versus 22. 6% for SCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPGI leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 48x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 34x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Service Corporation International (SCI) trades at 19. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 6x for S&P Global Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPGI: 29. 3% to $548. 11.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Service Corporation International (SCI) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 9% for S&P Global Inc. (SPGI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

11), 1. 6% yield, +231. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCI: +231. 9%, SPGI: +331. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SCI (Consumer Cyclical) and SPGI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.