Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SD vs WTI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
SD vs WTI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $552M | $568M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $164M | $522M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $-142M |
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 2.9% |
| Operating Margin | 38.9% | -5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $351M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $141M |
SD vs WTI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 100 | 948.1 | +848.1% |
| W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) | 100 | 146.4 | +46.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SD vs WTI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 24.8%, EPS growth 12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.0%
- Beta 0.11, yield 2.9%, current ratio 2.17x
- 24.8% revenue growth vs WTI's -4.5%
WTI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 1.1%
- 73.5% 10Y total return vs SD's 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 1.02x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.8% revenue growth vs WTI's -4.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.4% margin vs WTI's -27.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SD's 0.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, vs WTI's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +208.8% vs SD's +64.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.0% ROA vs WTI's -14.6%, ROIC 10.7% vs -32.5% |
SD vs WTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SD vs WTI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $522M annually — 3.2x SD's $164M. SD is the more profitable business, keeping 46.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTI's -27.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $164M | $522M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $108M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | -$142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +2.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | -5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | -27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +11.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.8% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.9% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SD and WTI each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SD's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WTI's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $552M | $568M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $441M | $779M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.88x | -3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.54x | 8.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 1.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.00x | 20.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SD leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SD scores 8/9 vs WTI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.0% | -14.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | -6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$111M | $210M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $141M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $351M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 80.91x | -1.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SD and WTI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth $43,778 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,950 for WTI. Over the past 12 months, WTI leads with a +208.8% total return vs SD's +64.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SD at 12.5% vs WTI's -3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.2% | +137.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.5% | +208.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.5% | -9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +337.8% | +9.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | +73.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.5% | -3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTI is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SD's 0.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTI currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs SD's 81.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.45 | $4.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.11 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 395K | 9.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SD and WTI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SD as "Hold" and WTI as "Hold". For income investors, SD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.87% vs WTI's 1.06%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
SD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WTI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
SD vs WTI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SD or WTI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SandRidge Energy, Inc.
(SD) is the stronger pick with 24. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SD or WTI?
Over the past 5 years, SandRidge Energy, Inc.
(SD) delivered a total return of +337. 8%, compared to +9. 5% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTI returned +73. 5% versus SD's +1. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SD or WTI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), W&T Offshore, Inc.
(WTI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus SandRidge Energy, Inc. 's 0. 11β — meaning SD is approximately 914% more volatile than WTI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SD or WTI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SandRidge Energy, Inc.
(SD) is pulling ahead at 24. 8% versus -4. 5% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SandRidge Energy, Inc. grew EPS 12. 4% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for W&T Offshore, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SD leads at -15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SD or WTI?
SandRidge Energy, Inc.
(SD) is the more profitable company, earning 44. 9% net margin versus -29. 9% for W&T Offshore, Inc. — meaning it keeps 44. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SD leads at 34. 7% versus -10. 5% for WTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SD leads at 43. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SD or WTI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 1% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI).
07Is SD or WTI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, W&T Offshore, Inc.
(WTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTI: +73. 5%, SD: +1. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SD and WTI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SD is a small-cap high-growth stock; WTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.