Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $53.62B | $94.80B | $2.92T | $340.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21.04B | $28.89B | $742.78B | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.43B | $2.00B | $90.80B | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 44.5% | 50.6% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 11.1% | 11.5% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 39.2x | 34.8x | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.12B | $11.39B | $152.99B | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.41B | $3.67B | $86.81B | $181.73B |
SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 219.6 | +119.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
MELI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 39.1% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9%
- Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 12.2% margin vs SE's 6.8%
- +43.7% vs SE's -37.8%
- 11.5% ROA vs MELI's 5.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 20.8%
BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- Lower P/E (4.1x vs 34.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.1% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.1x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SE's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SE's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs MELI's 5.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 20.8% |
SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BABA leads 2 • SE leads 1 • MELI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 48.1x SE's $21.0B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SE's 6.8%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.0B | $28.9B | $742.8B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $4.0B | $155.9B | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $2.0B | $90.8B | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.9B | $10.1B | -$2.5B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +44.5% | +50.6% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +11.1% | +11.5% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +6.9% | +12.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +35.0% | -0.3% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +44.6% | +16.6% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.9% | -12.5% | +74.8% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.9x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 85% valuation discount to SE's 121.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SE's 52.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53.6B | $94.8B | $2.92T | $340.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55.3B | $102.5B | $2.98T | $350.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 121.47x | 47.47x | 37.82x | 17.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.06x | 39.21x | 34.77x | 4.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.61x | 27.18x | 20.47x | 13.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 3.28x | 4.07x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.32x | 14.05x | 7.14x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.14x | 8.80x | 378.98x | 29.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $11 for BABA. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs MELI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +33.7% | +23.3% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +20.8% | +14.7% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +28.3% | +15.3% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 1.69x | 0.37x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $7.7B | $66.2B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $3.7B | $86.8B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $11.4B | $153.0B | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.70x | 17.53x | 39.96x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,690 for SE. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SE's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SE's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.6% | -5.3% | +19.7% | -9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.8% | -17.3% | +43.7% | +16.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | +45.6% | +156.2% | +74.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.1% | +26.2% | +64.8% | -35.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +455.5% | +1370.4% | +697.8% | +83.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | +13.3% | +36.8% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MELI is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SE's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.20x | 1.51x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $199.30 | $2645.22 | $278.56 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.05 | $1593.21 | $185.01 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.5% | +70.7% | +97.3% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 54.8 | 81.1 | 61.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 472K | 45.5M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SE as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.5% upside for SE (target: $148) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $147.67 | $2420.00 | $306.77 | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 33 | 94 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BABA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SE vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger pick with 39. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (4. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 17.
9x versus Sea Limited at 121. 5x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -63. 1% for Sea Limited (SE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1370% versus BABA's +83. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 26% more volatile than MELI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is pulling ahead at 39. 1% versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for MercadoLibre, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 4.
1x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 35. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 66. 5% to $147. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SE, MELI, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SE or MELI or AMZN or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1370% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1370%, SE: +455. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SE and MELI and AMZN and BABA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while SE, MELI, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.