Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Entertainment | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $74M | $38.65B | $3.15B | $436M | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $533M | $25.61B | $1.16B | $292M | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-438M | $84M | $42M | $-11M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | 40.3% | 31.5% | 67.6% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -71.4% | 3.4% | 10.1% | -8.9% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 115.8x | 56.8x | — | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $12.44B | $1.20B | $145M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $7.11B | $43M | $300M | $30.71B |
SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 102.6 | +2.6% |
| Eventbrite, Inc. (EB) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 492.5 | +392.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEAT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LYV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 1.00x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 1.00x
- Beta 0.80 vs SEAT's 2.12
MSGE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, EB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs LYV's 6.2%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SEAT's -26.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SEAT's -26.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.6x vs 56.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs SEAT's -82.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs SEAT's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs SEAT's -74.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs SEAT's -48.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs -10.3% |
SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
SEAT leads 0 • LYV leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • EB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1447.9x EB's $292M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEAT's -82.2%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $533M | $25.6B | $1.2B | $292M | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$329M | $1.6B | $245M | -$26M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$438M | $84M | $42M | -$11M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $1.2B | $289M | $13M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.4% | +40.3% | +31.5% | +67.6% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.4% | +3.4% | +10.1% | -8.9% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -82.2% | +0.3% | +3.6% | -3.6% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +4.8% | +25.0% | +4.6% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.3% | +12.1% | +59.4% | -3.9% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.6% | -4.8% | -123.5% | +6.6% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SEAT and EB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 58% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LYV's 19.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOGL's 32.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74M | $38.6B | $3.2B | $436M | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $44.0B | $4.3B | $280M | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | -692.98x | 86.64x | -41.00x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 115.80x | 56.83x | — | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.87x | 19.89x | 23.97x | — | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.53x | 3.35x | 1.49x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 21.20x | — | 2.43x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 115.84x | 33.88x | 24.71x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SEAT. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs SEAT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +4.4% | +7.7% | -5.9% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.9% | +0.4% | +1.8% | -1.4% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.3% | +19.7% | +8.5% | -187.3% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +13.4% | +11.0% | -8.4% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 6.84x | — | 0.81x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$82M | $5.3B | $1.2B | -$155M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $7.1B | $43M | $300M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $12.4B | $1.2B | $145M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.45x | 3.68x | 4.43x | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $693 for SEAT. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs SEAT's -74.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs SEAT's -61.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | +14.5% | +22.8% | +1.6% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.5% | +24.0% | +83.6% | +106.9% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +113.7% | +94.8% | -30.3% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +108.0% | -26.2% | -79.6% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +622.5% | -24.6% | -87.6% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.6% | +28.8% | +24.9% | -11.3% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYV and EB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYV is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEAT's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EB currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SEAT's 19.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 0.80x | 0.94x | 1.09x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.20 | $175.25 | $69.86 | $4.51 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.06 | $125.34 | $35.31 | $2.05 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.8% | +94.9% | +95.5% | +100.0% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 63.6 | 67.6 | 60.8 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 2.8M | 312K | 3.5M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYV as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", EB as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 149.0% upside for EB (target: $11) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $181.00 | $66.29 | $11.23 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 12 | 10 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +24.6% | +0.1% | +1.3% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SEAT vs LYV vs MSGE vs EB vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 4% for Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, Alphabet Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -93. 1% for Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus SEAT's -93. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Vivid Seats Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning SEAT is approximately 166% more volatile than LYV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -26. 4% for Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eventbrite, Inc. grew EPS 35. 3% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for Vivid Seats Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYV leads at 14. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -75. 2% for Vivid Seats Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -8. 9% for EB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EB leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) trades at 29. 6x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 86. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EB: 149. 0% to $11. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SEAT, LYV, MSGE, EB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEAT or LYV or MSGE or EB or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), +622. 5% 10Y return). Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYV: +622. 5%, SEAT: -93. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEAT and LYV and MSGE and EB and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEAT (Communication Services) and LYV (Communication Services) and MSGE (Communication Services) and EB (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.