SEAT
Vivid Seats Inc.
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-95.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SEAT vs SPHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SPHR
Sphere Entertainment Co.
Entertainment
Market Cap$4.92B
5Y Perf.+355.5%
SEAT vs SPHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SEAT | SPHR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $74M | $4.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $533M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-438M | $120M |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | 48.3% |
| Operating Margin | -71.4% | -10.6% |
| Total Debt | $20M | $1.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $560M |
SEAT vs SPHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SEAT
SPHR
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Sphere Entertainmen… (SPHR) | 100 | 455.5 | +355.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEAT vs SPHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SPHR leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SEAT
Vivid Seats Inc.
The Income Pick
SEAT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.12
Best for: income & stability
SPHR
Sphere Entertainment Co.
The Growth Play
SPHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- 234.5% 10Y total return vs SEAT's -93.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 62.9%, current ratio 0.63x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SPHR | 21.6% revenue growth vs SEAT's -26.4% |
| Quality / Margins | SPHR | 9.0% margin vs SEAT's -82.2% |
| Stability / Safety | SPHR | Beta 1.64 vs SEAT's 2.12 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SPHR | +359.1% vs SEAT's -74.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SPHR | 2.9% ROA vs SEAT's -48.9%, ROIC -5.0% vs -10.3% |
SEAT vs SPHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
SEAT vs SPHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSPHRLAGGINGSEAT
SEATVivid Seats Inc.
1leads
SPHRSphere Entertainment …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SEATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SPHR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SEAT2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SPHR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SPHR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.5x SEAT's $533M. SPHR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEAT's -82.2%. On growth, SPHR holds the edge at +37.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SEATVivid Seats Inc. | SPHRSphere Entertainm… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $533M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$329M | $196M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$438M | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $333M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.4% | +48.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.4% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -82.2% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.3% | +37.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.6% | +98.0% |
SPHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SEAT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SEATVivid Seats Inc. | SPHRSphere Entertainm… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74M | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | -24.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.87x | 175.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
SEAT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SEAT and SPHR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPHR delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SEAT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEAT scores 4/9 vs SPHR's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SEATVivid Seats Inc. | SPHRSphere Entertainm… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +5.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.9% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.3% | -5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | -6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$82M | $959M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $560M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.45x | 4.10x |
Evenly matched — SEAT and SPHR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPHR five years ago would be worth $32,765 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $693 for SEAT. Over the past 12 months, SPHR leads with a +359.1% total return vs SEAT's -74.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPHR at 63.5% vs SEAT's -61.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SEATVivid Seats Inc. | SPHRSphere Entertainm… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | +45.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.5% | +359.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +336.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +227.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +234.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.6% | +63.5% |
SPHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPHR is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEAT's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPHR currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs SEAT's 19.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SEATVivid Seats Inc. | SPHRSphere Entertainm… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.20 | $147.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.06 | $29.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.8% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 729K |
SPHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SEATVivid Seats Inc. | SPHRSphere Entertainm… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $121.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +24.6% | +0.7% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SPHR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SEAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallSphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SEAT vs SPHR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEAT or SPHR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sphere Entertainment Co.
(SPHR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SEAT or SPHR?
Over the past 5 years, Sphere Entertainment Co.
(SPHR) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -93. 1% for Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPHR returned +234. 5% versus SEAT's -93. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SEAT or SPHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sphere Entertainment Co.
(SPHR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus Vivid Seats Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning SEAT is approximately 29% more volatile than SPHR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SEAT or SPHR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sphere Entertainment Co.
grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for Vivid Seats Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPHR leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SEAT or SPHR?
Sphere Entertainment Co.
(SPHR) is the more profitable company, earning -19. 5% net margin versus -75. 2% for Vivid Seats Inc. — meaning it keeps -19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEAT leads at -7. 3% versus -21. 7% for SPHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEAT leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SEAT or SPHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SEAT or SPHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sphere Entertainment Co.
(SPHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+234. 5% 10Y return). Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPHR: +234. 5%, SEAT: -93. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SEAT and SPHR?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SEAT: -23.3% · SPHR: 37.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.